Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vNcOO-008kbk-2V for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:38:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vNcON-003bi8-13 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:38:31 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vNcON-003bi0-08 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:38:31 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vNcOL-001Hg0-0P for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:38:31 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 5AOJcPHj987825; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 14:38:25 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Robert Haas cc: Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: get rid of Pointer type, mostly In-reply-to: References: <4154950a-47ae-4223-bd01-1235cc50e933@eisentraut.org> <955002.1764000569@sss.pgh.pa.us> <957744.1764002037@sss.pgh.pa.us> <970261.1764008763@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Mon, 24 Nov 2025 14:32:24 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <987823.1764013105.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 14:38:25 -0500 Message-ID: <987824.1764013105@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Robert Haas writes: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 1:26 PM Tom Lane wrote: >> I don't understand leaving it in place for GIN. > I haven't tried removing it for GIN so I don't know how awkward that > would be or for what reasons, but... Well, either Peter just ran out of energy or there is actually some notational value in Pointer. If it's the latter, I'd like to know. regards, tom lane