Received: from localhost (pluto.hub.org [200.46.204.4]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA3E9FB22E for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 01:01:46 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32581-01 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 01:01:40 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from exprod6og56.obsmtp.com (exprod6og56.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.208]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAED29FB22C for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 01:01:36 -0400 (AST) Received: from source ([63.240.6.44]) by exprod6ob56.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 21:01:32 PST Received: from 172.16.1.114 by mail.mi8.com with ESMTP (- Welcome to Mi8 Corporation www.Mi8.com (D4)); Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:01:23 -0500 X-Server-Uuid: C8FB4D43-1108-484A-A898-3CBCC7906230 Received: from MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.175]) by d01smtp07.Mi8.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 00:00:22 -0500 Received: from 69.181.100.71 ([69.181.100.71]) by MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com ( [172.16.1.219]) via Exchange Front-End Server mi8owa.mi8.com ( [172.16.1.105]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:00:21 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 21:00:19 -0800 Subject: Re: Block B-tree etc. (was Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent From: "Luke Lonergan" To: "Heikki Linnakangas" cc: "Simon Riggs" , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Block B-tree etc. (was Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent Update) Thread-Index: AccCUkxxcan44j2vSy6doD8sJ0gs2AAoH0bP In-Reply-To: <45505719.1070602@enterprisedb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Nov 2006 05:00:22.0168 (UTC) FILETIME=[CB6E1980:01C702F2] X-WSS-ID: 694FBB282TS13929742-04-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200611/209 X-Sequence-Number: 93671 Heikki, On 11/7/06 1:51 AM, "Heikki Linnakangas" wrote: > I don't think Simon's proposal is meant to address that issue, but did > you follow the thread I started in September about Block B-Tree index: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg02041.php Aha - mystery solved - thanks for the clarification. Block Btree ~= Lossy Btree - Luke