MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CA+HiwqFfAY_ZFqN8wcAEMw71T9hM_kA8UtyHaZZEZtuT3UyogA@mail.gmail.com>
 <68f3771f-91f5-4cb7-b1de-74d9abbf0b96@vondra.me>
 <CA+HiwqGqeS_94wxiYa8VpymiR_OtFPKDSpX+Me=MYWO45f5yig@mail.gmail.com>
 <dbce8def-e817-4e70-a9cb-e62574724d95@vondra.me>
 <CA+HiwqGM0ZTeVHicSkGnCp-2U-jvU-KBQCkPJ0N7nAj_c2LjZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJDiXgh7vJAu39QkEk4TiJexPVsM6X6RXeNy7dNX9KjhX_5=9A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJDiXgh7vJAu39QkEk4TiJexPVsM6X6RXeNy7dNX9KjhX_5=9A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:22:47 +0900
Message-ID: 
 <CA+HiwqED=0D1jQsYoXGuATxKr=Pxhm24Kwh01212KBAJ-bK9Bg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Batching in executor
To: Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>,
 PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqED%3D0D1jQsYoXGuATxKr%3DPxhm24Kwh01212KBAJ-bK9Bg%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Daniil,

On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 11:32=E2=80=AFPM Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.c=
om> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As far as I understand, this work partially overlaps with what we did in =
the
> thread [1] (in short - we introduce support for batching within the Modif=
yTable
> node). Am I correct?

There might be some relation, but not much overlap. The thread you
mention seems to focus on batching in the write path (for INSERT,
etc.), while this work targets batching in the read path via Table AM
scan callbacks. I think they can be developed independently, though
I'm happy to take a look.

--=20
Thanks, Amit Langote