public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Amit Langote <[email protected]>
To: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rowley <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 20:11:54 +0900
Message-ID: <CA+HiwqEp6CssT00wiJxTVO_d6nrsmpsM8doOkOHmC5=vN3dHCg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CA+HiwqGoORM+yfm8PhGWfHNUSBbSUgTQC=s5ieV8b4FX1yDBrg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 6:55 PM Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm looking at 0001 here with intention to commit later. I see that
> there is some resistance to 0004, but I think a final verdict on that
> one doesn't materially affect 0001.
Thanks.
While the main goal of the refactoring patch is to make it easier to
review the more complex changes that 0004 makes to execPartition.c, I
agree it has merit on its own. Although, one may say that the bit
about providing a PlanState-independent ExprContext is more closely
tied with 0004's requirements...
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
view thread (108+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
In-Reply-To: <CA+HiwqEp6CssT00wiJxTVO_d6nrsmpsM8doOkOHmC5=vN3dHCg@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox