MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ZiH7vHwEJeRKHlST@paquier.xyz> <c786e226-4039-4522-ba07-92501fce9b6a@iki.fi>
 <CAOYmi+kbYPX78nu0k7OODxUhoD6H1OXdugiMK1z9Nn33G-qdcQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <a0983295-67ae-487e-84e3-6e1148af3a25@iki.fi> <ZiYPmUZjcQtPz2j7@paquier.xyz>
 <feebbeee-df5f-484f-b07e-062bd0230bd2@iki.fi> <ZidKMB1tcgM3bzFZ@paquier.xyz>
 <CAOYmi+n57x+8DVi9J+dGmFQo+2Eb+bg_+geH=jqfh3E=NWHfOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoaLpDVY2ywqQUfxvKEQZ+nwkabcw_f=i4Zyivt9CLjcmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOYmi+=sj+1uydS0NR4nYzw-LRWp3Q-s5speBug5UCLSPMbvGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5a79ed71-b365-4b20-80bc-9c2bf97bf84b@iki.fi> <CAOYmi+kfsRfopQRTuJwpsO50Urq=-gwYDJ1fWNkDr3oYM1wdjA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOYmi+kfsRfopQRTuJwpsO50Urq=-gwYDJ1fWNkDr3oYM1wdjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 12:17:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+TgmoZspODpL6AYbANpffhbF+Q12xo1pHXrR9ZSkYfEQWpP3w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules
To: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, 
	Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZspODpL6AYbANpffhbF%2BQ12xo1pHXrR9ZSkYfEQWpP3w%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:16=E2=80=AFPM Jacob Champion
<jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote
> Right. I don't like that it still happens with
> sslnegotiation=3Drequiredirect, but I suspect that this is not the
> thread to complain about it in. Maybe I can propose a
> sslnegotiation=3Dforcedirect or something for 18, to complement a
> postgresqls:// scheme.

It is difficult to imagine a world in which we have both requiredirect
and forcedirect and people are not confused.

--=20
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com