MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CA+TgmoZv8DvmeQHQAX+rkn68id2N+DoUhFZB36d-_w1tyAeqeA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220707222015.GD13040@telsasoft.com>
 <CAA4eK1Lmo0FX6Nfr_k3-UX1Hpei1H-xPHL6Wwx7SLUP3s+O1mA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAA4eK1Lmo0FX6Nfr_k3-UX1Hpei1H-xPHL6Wwx7SLUP3s+O1mA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 08:07:46 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CA+Tgmob0BBeK6GEMUQBPiv0kJpTJSEgX+OUD2FeY42zWVgJuLw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>,
 Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>,
	vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>,
	"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
 pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
 Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>,
	Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmob0BBeK6GEMUQBPiv0kJpTJSEgX%2BOUD2FeY42zWVgJuLw%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 6:47 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I feel the discussion has slightly deviated which makes it unclear
> whether this patch is required or not?

My opinion is that showing some fractional digits at least when
loops>1 would be better than what we have now. It might not be the
best thing we could do, but it would be better than doing nothing.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com