Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vg95M-008iSH-2m for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 22:11:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vg95M-00DA5H-0F for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 22:11:28 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vg95L-00DA50-29 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 22:11:28 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vg95J-000SSr-1E for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 22:11:27 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b86f69bbe60so46952866b.1 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:11:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1768428684; x=1769033484; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ZMjuPHvYbyLm31QjOMWl0q0Uubb4pW/GmIc9G0HNZ3E=; b=mZKYP/eGiT5vksqOqxGQQ4GX6Zy5iBHwsn3H1+bDwQUUpH79YL9TKP5wNVpigdlGVO QZ/b+gFCNxMdl8dXWd+QWyoF2q9gd4lHJrpfEZs23ln6cezjA6vomliBypSIZR2yNYi4 Vr6WJ2au3XCEdTY4PPI02yJrTsNRSnb+9NlMynk5mHC7oJ8bB3vr2e16tX3AXahZxwye SjDImp6kaGE5UHDUFjtvdetumx3Vx0B+QpiAKV60VO6V3IiNS+Yey3I0ay/tvUaYSKpi mewmdNRTJDNL5aL45Vinn1QigSlMPJfU1c5KhEgYQ0Ke2YXlC0KLIraexzJpllI/xmcB U4jw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768428684; x=1769033484; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZMjuPHvYbyLm31QjOMWl0q0Uubb4pW/GmIc9G0HNZ3E=; b=ka/Zjfk4mnUkYangDKyToq52gbrDAeAenySeuhbm5EurWPDdQQGXObODixhWIOdFJp jjnuWNzbaPOpUW67JIBNC+Y/2WOiKkZbTu7fpZcC6nveasNZXNdupEPnf0zKwMyJGUPz VjrhhHy4aT70K+Xmovwhd2RUpvq1diU6vWfW7BqBrvmaDmFRBllm3S9NEv52pIpaYkH7 pyE+BIV9Et/+wLnxwWPoBtPqP36Px696GprgN5gxtq3HPXttN7qoMJ9Ugofy10QjolnZ +5oxC+mILJEQtdBU2UrwXGo78/t/azULbA96wmMD1thqTWOUcX2rA7asOgDA3e8KDLqd pyHw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWx9xu66Pi3QCPZ+KSib5gWeMfad2GCFFTKKaJLzklUfV2urVaZma8+8lfqUjbZPLi9cSafAnaw4tPY42ht@lists.postgresql.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxqujmiDgZ/vHEtMjb9VAZFWnhv+i0kHqq6dfLwIKp6Wag5f4DQ CvZUReTzGC7x1jsKElqxXSz9H+941l9c6O8QaaOEMcA5L6EO5QjqU2pvyNQIzrzn0F2JupL79fE phYQmDg1wAy/OfnZ0fnz/4qJ8siMZHM0= X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX4P1g26DL2SaeCM0lR3JGz7snYqq01sDBSUi643tcb48+XJpuOEUETCcIWQgKO 8ITNPWfRFDEonFYSNHooSX17l/Vr5buFQt0fhH/iLdUmvvKpb6NcvCh/eAsHT462lW1XI5oumuF pcE0e6JSFphi15Xv3X2UEjZJelSmPr3F3dWW4aafvFCrFlBMMSRatSjakROMB4XILX4SHHacVU+ JanpGcPIBnSIocxu3rh2BJ3t8nqaZd3l3DcYoP0zVT8+czXn9VETFadkSQU2/H3nM88kRQhANOt p2BuHbDu9TckWdGrxV9+8ijq1b8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6a09:b0:b87:965:9078 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b8760fcbe64mr300829366b.7.1768428683475; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:11:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Robert Haas Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 17:11:11 -0500 X-Gm-Features: AZwV_QhvjyHmtYRURWsmV2RRDrkYVfjMsXW6kJK7hEk_qZEx9c5f2KCJluK2skM Message-ID: Subject: Re: pg_plan_advice To: Jakub Wartak Cc: Lukas Fittl , Jacob Champion , Dian Fay , Matheus Alcantara , PostgreSQL Hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 6:02=E2=80=AFAM Jakub Wartak wrote: > a) q4.sql (please see attached file for repro). More or less: right > after import I get a hard failure if the earlier recommended advice is > enabled (smells like a bug to me: we shouldn't get any errors even if > advice is bad). This can be solved by ANALYZE, but brought up back by > truncating pg_statistics > ERROR: unique semijoin found for relids (b 3) but not observed during pl= anning > STATEMENT: explain (timing off, costs off, settings off, memory off) Hmm, so the plan tree walker thinks that we did a semijoin between lineitem and orders by making lineitem unique on the join column and then performing a regular join. That appears to be correct. But pgpa_join_path_setup never created a pgpa_join_path_setup for that possibility, or created one that doesn't actually match up properly to what was found in the plan tree. Can you check whether a pgpa_sj_unique_rel gets created in pgpa_join_path_setup, and with what contents? > a) q8.sql (please see attached file for demo). It is even more > bizarre, happens right after import , fixed by ANALYZE, but even > TRUNCATING pg_statistic doesnt bring back the problem. Pinpointed that > additional pg_clear_relation_stats() triggers the problem back. I found this one. I now think that pgpa_planner_apply_join_path_advice() shouldn't added anything to jo_permit_indexes when a join method hint implicitly permits a join order. I simplified your test case to this: set pg_plan_advice.advice =3D 'JOIN_ORDER(n1 region customer) NESTED_LOOP_PLAIN(region)'; explain (costs off, plan_advice) SELECT n1.n_name AS nation FROM customer, nation n1, region WHERE c_nationkey =3D n1.n_nationkey AND n1.n_regionkey =3D r_regionkey AND r_name =3D 'AMERICA'; What was happening here is that when we considered a join between {customer, nation} and region, pgpa_planner_apply_join_path_advice() said, well, according to the JOIN_ORDER advice, this join order is not allowed, which is correct. And, according to the NESTED_LOOP_PLAIN advice, this join order is allowed, which is also correct, because NESTED_LOOP_PLAIN(region) denies join orders where region is the driving table, since those would make it impossible to respect the advice, and this join order doesn't do that. Then, it concludes that because one piece of advice says the join order is OK and the other says it isn't, the advice conflicts. This is where I think it's going off the rails: the NESTED_LOOP_PLAIN() advice should only be allowed to act as a negative constraint, not a positive one. So what I did is: diff --git a/contrib/pg_plan_advice/pgpa_planner.c b/contrib/pg_plan_advice/pgpa_planner.c index 13f81e9b063..95dd71deb84 100644 --- a/contrib/pg_plan_advice/pgpa_planner.c +++ b/contrib/pg_plan_advice/pgpa_planner.c @@ -982,7 +982,6 @@ pgpa_planner_apply_join_path_advice(JoinType jointype, uint64 *pgs_mask_p, jo_deny_indexes =3D bms_add_member(jo_deny_indexes, i); else if (restrict_method) { - jo_permit_indexes =3D bms_add_member(jo_permit_indexes, i)= ; jm_indexes =3D bms_add_member(jm_indexes, i); if (join_mask !=3D 0 && join_mask !=3D my_join_mask) jm_conflict =3D true; @@ -1038,8 +1037,6 @@ pgpa_planner_apply_join_path_advice(JoinType jointype, uint64 *pgs_mask_p, } else if (advice_unique !=3D jt_unique) jo_deny_indexes =3D bms_add_member(jo_deny_indexes, i)= ; - else - jo_permit_indexes =3D bms_add_member(jo_permit_indexes= , i); } continue; } > To me it looks like "pps" is NULL and hits "if > (pps->generate_advice_string)" because > GetPlannerGlobalExtensionState() returns NULL because > root->glob->extension_state_allocated is 0 (while planner_extension_id > is also 0). Crash is only happening for q20 and q4, till I've tried > the below fixup which seems to solve it (?) - it's just based on the > fact that all other uses of GetPlannerGlobalExtensionState() seem to > check for NULL: > > - if (pps->generate_advice_string) > + if (pps !=3D NULL && pps->generate_advice_string) Agreed, will incorporate that fix. > 3b) XXX - marker:I was looking for a solution and apparently cfbot > farm has those options, so they should be testing it anyway. And this > brings me to a fact, that it maybe could be detected by cfbot, however > the $thread is not registered so cfbot had no chance to see what's > more there? (I'm mainly thinking about any cross-platform issues, if > any). I mean, there is https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6184/ --=20 Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com