MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Z0qNdMfAJYJmyTEI@paquier.xyz> <202411300828.hwe55pzx5a4x@alvherre.pgsql>
 <Z00SLoxwnjvuYeAv@paquier.xyz> <CAA4eK1JMuOni-s5ZX1ahWZJLtOJbzbBsXZ8LiBPV_LN=736xEQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <Z01fjH6ua4Na2LAr@paquier.xyz> <CAA4eK1LPDBqTjJMH5kowHq+NExR1vLecAweVEzNSONrsqCc2KQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <Z06pWkQAgQvKYqwG@paquier.xyz>
In-Reply-To: <Z06pWkQAgQvKYqwG@paquier.xyz>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 14:01:00 +0530
Message-ID: <CAA4eK1+-jNguD8j6ezGXVZM_hdwaahXPpT0816Zi3ePaJGQgew@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, 
	Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1%2B-jNguD8j6ezGXVZM_hdwaahXPpT0816Zi3ePaJGQgew%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 12:17=E2=80=AFPM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xy=
z> wrote:
>
> So how about the attached that introduces a FreePublication() matching
> with GetPublication(), used to do the cleanup?  Feel free to comment.
>

As you would have noted I am fine with the fix on these lines but I
suggest holding it till we conclude the memory context point raised by
me today. It is possible that we are still leaking some memory in
other related scenarios.

--=20
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.