public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
To: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Cc: Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
Cc: Mihail Nikalayeu <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <[email protected]>
Cc: Pg Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 08:29:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA4eK1K7Q=CNNr0_t5aXVD8t9UW2xSFdjOgG4cSB6-G2c8DK=Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAA4eK1+nJUc147td7NgVuW=gjV9+Rd04+kkLssQL5MR1oUMnJA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 11:52 AM Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 2026-May-14, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
> > The broader issue is that the entire logical decoding mechanism is
> > designed to process cluster-wide transactions. This patch tries to
> > bypass that foundational assumption, but only during the initial
> > snapshot construction while processing running_xacts record.
> >
> > To be clear, I am not against the idea of db-specific snapshots to
> > enable concurrent repacks. My concern is simply the time required to
> > get the architecture right. In its current state, we need more time to
> > carefully consider how this db-specific concept interacts with the
> > rest of the logical decoding machinery, which is built for
> > cluster-wide records.
>
> Hmm. So at this point I have to admit that the time I'll have before
> beta 1 is going to be very scarce. You're probably right that it's
> better to revert db-specific snapshots in pg19, and try again for 20.
>
Sounds reasonable.
> The revert should be a simple patch.
>
I also think so.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
In-Reply-To: <CAA4eK1K7Q=CNNr0_t5aXVD8t9UW2xSFdjOgG4cSB6-G2c8DK=Q@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox