MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFPTHDZXX9WQ_X1ZfEvS248T+pKuk6SmCnXcvgPM059N1xPUfA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJpy0uDLUEjHHME8om1vAf6qkXCeRR6cBvkpK8yWBAC=T0ZFLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFPTHDZg1JrunGgOj332hr+gUuH_Jm7skqPpYSvd-QE3yEdRDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJpy0uBz7MCSUkvFJD9ij65vBahNmY+bfCgdGKRqXovYs+K_TA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJpy0uDsuNqjWd-TmGBxqSS1rnVCJ3B8=SYrtxQ=Vs8kb71QFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJpy0uAMWg3KcXtVBS7B0rnchLNrCCVYBByJCzAp=u5LERgtfA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFPTHDZwEhxhDAeqcPi0GuYN6xBs8gFXHOMUnbg3u2Xigcz4Zg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE9k0PmTyCU1A9YEf+MRgfeZ8yK1bAYJu=o0bH8DNUTzXejQyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA4eK1L6czEzG4mLNZSyjYC5nX0FMSjjk3csKuxPD3Ph5-7Yvw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJpy0uAhGQJ=msVsn2GsqWXr+YESJK6x9NBvrUtKvtvp1OVuKQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJpy0uAhGQJ=msVsn2GsqWXr+YESJK6x9NBvrUtKvtvp1OVuKQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 13:11:48 +0530
Message-ID: <CAA4eK1LFYdqzQvBF8ygwQn+tJBpNP3ODnx-ArpgOeGuV7F+5OA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support automatic sequence replication
To: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>, 
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1LFYdqzQvBF8ygwQn%2BtJBpNP3ODnx-ArpgOeGuV7F%2B5OA%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 12:36=E2=80=AFPM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.c=
om> wrote:
>
> I tested a few scenarios on the latest patch. Sequence sync worker did
> not stop in below scenarios:
>
> 1) When the subscription was disabled.
> 2) When the only publication for sequences was dropped from
> subscription ( ALTER SUBSCRIPTION sub1 DROP PUBLICATION pub_seq;)
> 3) When all sequences were dropped on sub.
>
> Application worker stops in scenario 1, seq-sync worker should also
> stop. See maybe_reread_subscription().
>
> We need to decide the behavior of the seq-sync worker for 2 and 3.
>

Shouldn't we try to map (2) and (3) to what we do for table publication?

--=20
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.