public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabrice Chapuis <[email protected]>
To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: wal recycling problem
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:48:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA5-nLB5axGwwj6ft6G5tHxKqEC932M5k-4Ytb2W1iQziqmuLQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAA5-nLCrbc90DHbX_9Yav72hEXUetkZ9iO8zmKvCvYNZkDHx9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>

Yes, barman replication can keep up with primary, wals segments size are
under max_wal_size (24Gb in our configuration)

Here is  pg_replication_slots view:

barman_ge      physical  f          t            39409 1EE2/49000000
reserved    f
barman_be      physical  f          t            39434 1EE2/3D000000
reserved    f

on the other hand there are 2 slots for logical replication which display
status extended. I don't understand why given that the confirmed_flush_lsn
field that is up to date. The restart_lsn remains frozen, for what reason?

pgoutput │ logical   │ 2667915 │ db019a00 │ f         │ t      │    1880162
│      │     68512101 │ 1ECA/37C3F1B8 │ 1EE2/4D6BDCF8       │ extended   │
             │ f         │
pgoutput │ logical   │ 2668584 │ db038a00 │ f         │ t      │
 363230  │      │     68512101 │ 1ECA/37C3F1B8 │ 1EE2/4D6BDCF8       │
extended   │               │ f         │

Regards
Fabrice

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:59 PM Christoph Moench-Tegeder <[email protected]>
wrote:

> ## Fabrice Chapuis ([email protected]):
>
> > We have a cluster of 2 members (1 primary and 1 standby) with Postgres
> > version 14.9 and 2 barman server, slots are only configured for barman,
> > barman is version 3.7.
>
> The obvious question here is: can both of those barmans keep up with
> your database, or are you seeing WAL retention due to exactly these
> replication slots? (Check pg_replication_slots).
>
> Regards,
> Christoph
>
> --
> Spare Space
>


view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: wal recycling problem
  In-Reply-To: <CAA5-nLB5axGwwj6ft6G5tHxKqEC932M5k-4Ytb2W1iQziqmuLQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox