MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAApHDvq0T=iJ0Sf5TNE9yyWwfOeVjmrBt0wSywDnGD9Y4YJQBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <3190647.1775103768@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <CAApHDvrvvq_m+nRwjsOpCsFa4EtVtmvJX7zAD=Siria-x6DpbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAApHDvqTUm3Cbgz3ZLV+ad8s_HJHZYrVbrBvGyPQdxCRR-6dvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <59B9EFAF-84DF-40A9-847F-9CF457A798BB@gmail.com>
 <CAApHDvocDY0qvhxRNBaNRjEr46j8TsGFig+=6bHN-NYS_dhSCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <D8422C13-E995-4D0D-B296-5D643DE89399@gmail.com>
 <CAApHDvo+WtKHWbgmPA+H2K24P6h6aUJ_9kAdS__G1L9LDFGwgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <64C19DC3-CE9B-4222-B71E-31B88574FBDC@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <64C19DC3-CE9B-4222-B71E-31B88574FBDC@gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:33:04 +1200
Message-ID: 
 <CAApHDvpVKtgtNsXXKECi4KhzH3JpN2k62tg=EcYmsEA+RsKj+A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Small and unlikely overflow hazard in bms_next_member()
To: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAApHDvpVKtgtNsXXKECi4KhzH3JpN2k62tg%3DEcYmsEA%2BRsKj%2BA%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 6 Apr 2026 at 14:01, Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 4, 2026, at 11:30, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Not quite perfect as a set made first as a single word set that later
> > becomes a multi-word set will be double counted. The number of
> > operations on the sets is likely more important anyway, not the number
> > of sets being created. The point is, multi-word sets are rare for most
> > workloads.
> >
>
> What tests did you run after adding the logs to collect the data? This is a method I might borrow in the future for similar investigations.

"make check" then grep regression.diffs for the NOTICE message and
pipe to "wc -l"