public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: David Rowley <[email protected]>
To: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <[email protected]>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Add parameter jit_warn_above_fraction
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:14:12 +1300
Message-ID: <CAApHDvquOZEk4dBi7OanRWSr96EQU+Qj_HFL1+foqywg3+vGyw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CABUevExe1fV0RzjA7vQRp_WkjtTVF1O9E5STKodWa2CmpFoqHA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CABUevEy9H+HPAuM1ofC=OuY2+bESOsA4hHSAY6HbLYyTG1oaPw@mail.gmail.com>
<20220329100846.3iedk5ear3ewdi5j@jrouhaud>
<CA+TgmoZ-AoXM=J5J===maHDY9O+Mbz-=Sfz-A23ZbiJoMKe_Rg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAApHDvrEoQ5p61NjDCKVgEWaH0qm1KprYw2-7m8-6ZGGJ8A2Dw@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAApHDvov2Zknd6KOT07YBOG1qGd4DCapAJ48gpa0161R7Sbc_g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAApHDvpfvFBP-=RrY3Jx6eaLYG-mUMLhhss7LLpB6HsAesFsDQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 14:48, Andres Freund <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 2022-03-30 14:30:32 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> > Maybe nodes below an Append/MergeAppend with run-time pruning could compile
> > on-demand and other nodes up-front. Or maybe there's no problem with making
> > everything on-demand.
>
> Yea, that could work. The expressions for one "partition query" would still
> have to be emitted at once. For each such subtree we should make a separate
> costing decision. But I think an additional "will be executed" sub-node is a
> different story, the threshold shouldn't be done on a per-node basis. That
> partitioning of the plan tree is kind of what I was trying to get at...
Maybe this point is moot if we get something like [1]. It might mean
that run-time pruning would happen early enough that we could just JIT
compile non-pruned subnodes.
David
[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/37/3478/
view thread (33+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Add parameter jit_warn_above_fraction
In-Reply-To: <CAApHDvquOZEk4dBi7OanRWSr96EQU+Qj_HFL1+foqywg3+vGyw@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox