MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAApHDvoCdjo8Cu2zEZF4-AxWG-90S+pYXAnoDDa9J3xH-OrczQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1104459.1695938385@sss.pgh.pa.us> <CAApHDvoMLP3ZpAE4_zivkT1GJU293BT7Yy-Kmo-kxU+Nc_-EWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAApHDvpzRrmzA2nv0N_ehMD1ajDQto+EpjLzfWoOW=qVu6eRRw@mail.gmail.com> <3363970.1696800505@sss.pgh.pa.us>
In-Reply-To: <3363970.1696800505@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:55:25 +1300
Message-ID: <CAApHDvrDJmYZxWfAhXyMv5gWwLp9ZtcRAtVCkApi-HYBE=aiuw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Does anyone ever use OPTIMIZER_DEBUG?
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAApHDvrDJmYZxWfAhXyMv5gWwLp9ZtcRAtVCkApi-HYBE%3Daiuw%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 10:28, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> > It looks like nobody is objecting to this.  I understand that not
> > everyone who might object will have read this email thread, so what I
> > propose to do here is move along and just commit the patch to swap out
> > debug_print_rel and use pprint instead.  If that's done now then there
> > are around 10 months where we could realistically revert this again if
> > someone were to come forward with an objection.
>
> > Sound ok?
>
> WFM.

Ok. I've pushed the patch.  Let's see if anyone comes forward.

David