public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Xuneng Zhou <[email protected]>
To: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: [BUG]: the walsender does not update its IO statistics until it exits
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 19:35:24 +0800
Message-ID: <CABPTF7Vf_j7Eb1F3wuaFHr6r6m2_4imVzSKCYPkciN+Ti2eR2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPTF7VRN_-DfrPFjVtRYuN0E8mWETtVp6tSXNsXDJPDAuHHxA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<Z8/[email protected]>
<Z9Kl8UfC/[email protected]>
<CABPTF7VRN_-DfrPFjVtRYuN0E8mWETtVp6tSXNsXDJPDAuHHxA@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry, forgot to cc this one too.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
发件人: Xuneng Zhou <[email protected]>
Date: 2025年3月13日周四 19:29
Subject: Re: [BUG]: the walsender does not update its IO statistics until
it exits
To: Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]>
Hi,
Given that PGSTAT_MIN_INTERVAL is the go-to setting for stats flushes
* Unless called with 'force', pending stats updates are flushed happen once
* per PGSTAT_MIN_INTERVAL (1000ms). When not forced, stats flushes do not
* block on lock acquisition, except if stats updates have been pending for
* longer than PGSTAT_MAX_INTERVAL (60000ms).
*
* Whenever pending stats updates remain at the end of pgstat_report_stat()
a
* suggested idle timeout is returned. Currently this is always
* PGSTAT_IDLE_INTERVAL (10000ms). Callers can use the returned time to set
up
* a timeout after which to call pgstat_report_stat(true), but are not
* required to do so.
I am curious about the reason for this:
> 1. maybe relying on PGSTAT_IDLE_INTERVAL would make more sense? In both
> case
> PGSTAT_MIN_INTERVAL or PGSTAT_MIN_INTERVAL, I'm not sure there is a need to
> update the related doc.
>
>
PGSTAT_IDLE_INTERVAL seems to reduce the frequency even more.
>
> With the attached in place, the number of times the stats are being flushed
> reduce drastically but still seems enough to get an accurate idea of the
> walsender
> IO activity. Thoughts?
>
>
>
view thread (40+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Fwd: [BUG]: the walsender does not update its IO statistics until it exits
In-Reply-To: <CABPTF7Vf_j7Eb1F3wuaFHr6r6m2_4imVzSKCYPkciN+Ti2eR2w@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox