On Tue, 3 Sept 2024 at 16:32, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:

I don't think you need to maintain CATALOG_VERSION_NO change in your
patch for the exact reason you have mentioned: patch will get conflict
each time CATALOG_VERSION_NO is advanced. It's responsibility of
committer to advance CATALOG_VERSION_NO when needed.

OK, I got it. My intention here was to help to test the patch. If someone wants to have a

look at the patch, he won't need to make changes in the code. In the next iteration, I'll

remove CATALOG_VERSION_NO version change.

Best regards,

Maxim Orlov.