public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shin Berg <[email protected]>
To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Khandekar <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in owner assignment between INDEX and STATISTICS
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 10:15:24 +0900
Message-ID: <CACSdjfN6ydot=nibVF5__-Q7H7AFUG5r96EYbV9SWnM4VBmVyg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CACSdjfMWcR7aJUDf6XNt_yaDi+riz3Ku4EQ-x3xA=Xx1209n2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ3gD9eJE_c=eSbBjqAAg+-x2XOSgZ5uYqyAiy4TrJJwxEXyng@mail.gmail.com>
	<CACSdjfPor9NRN4WiNZ5HmpdFn7q6dERHuZvaMxHMirXUYDC6_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>

Thank you for the additional context, Tom. That makes the design intent
much clearer.
Cross-table statistics, if realized, would be a significant improvement for
join cardinality estimation; looking forward to seeing that develop.

Regards,
Joshua Shin

On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 5:09 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:

> Shin Berg <[email protected]> writes:
> > Thank you for the detailed feedback, Amit.
> > You're right on both points. I had been comparing STATISTICS against
> INDEX
> > and treating the difference as an inconsistency, but as you point out,
> > INDEX ownership is special — it's tied to the table and intentionally not
> > user-adjustable. STATISTICS follows the same ownership model as VIEW (the
> > creator becomes the owner), which is consistent and by design.
>
> One point that was not mentioned is that while indexes are necessarily
> tied to a single table, statistics objects might not always be.  The
> long-term hope is to allow statistics on cross-table combinations of
> columns, which is why the syntax was intentionally set up to look like
> SELECT.  So, just like views, it's reasonable to give them independent
> ownership.
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>


view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Inconsistency in owner assignment between INDEX and STATISTICS
  In-Reply-To: <CACSdjfN6ydot=nibVF5__-Q7H7AFUG5r96EYbV9SWnM4VBmVyg@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox