public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
Cc: Drouvot, Bertrand <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Oh, Mike <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 10:32:06 +0900
Message-ID: <CAD21AoAG9v-YPaSxJjZK0uNOfY5onAXJbqkW=g33oGf7tJHZDg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYAPR01MB63155A51D65ABA4A0F876042FD869@TYAPR01MB6315.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
References: <[email protected]>
	<CAD21AoD00wV4gt-53ze+ZB8n4bqJrdH8J_UnDHddy8S2A+a25g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1L_e4r4=10TTzoOiWGQ6hH4vxWAwD=0aofz04czCTV0kQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAA4eK1JoKV2qmp916gFk=9SX=Qo21+sN4n-yjbB2b0Q1xxOKJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD21AoAn9T6mS8sMF5=tFV66Wru92s933ihRVunLPEU_+0=Xiw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1Lgfj2ww4V_zMxTmduB0BQpEsS-j7RT8BV-cy7Qyp1E3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD21AoDNJgYkrO1PQ=k6G9MfvRjhawMN-aZVT2spMr_ymmOhCQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD21AoC4x3uOw5rUcSYZkWob5s5ottGt_RPLxCEpHimFRDjrEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1L_Br0wNHwY1PrnusX1H2bvWR+iUnNC=1anKqhPBtnoMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1KMsU5PFHOvTD=3jHQ6aPa8N39eGwAVMVA6S0sXw1kMdw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD21AoD8v=pE+3AMezPrWJo=hpijNmop-XRbZ=3YG5zT5pBMnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1KuSxRhwUoJWVW--EseKcob94-hrP+JMCGvGTR+Fnx2aA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD21AoBHo3WQ+vaeiNzXuNw__08veBT9qYgCUD3jNLWG=4GzFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1KMegGo+QwMxJcHMbYN-3QOLH6hD2thWXA2_M3MLH01Ug@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD21AoCF=8SKOJYWF12fPEwXc5GLU2SvhfZ3QoR93Qqn+6oeSg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1LuFtCifCBY=uB_Orzjx-tc0O8DZqfFE_JuHptngeCcwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD21AoCBPL10=X83g6J2CXQRE11kXgiyzfVY2m=hS1O7YRqiWQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1JyJL7dACPQ51hQmSz5KrxghmABr_J9AZbSGzSLW3Ghig@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD21AoCAPkPxsqbe6ZTqOe0bcVrEWHmA3ObYQtyu0Bv8hC=z_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAD21AoC4+GeT_HRnCFuy0L37FHUSXOPEpXYp0wbQnFxCMiuD=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<TYAPR01MB63155A51D65ABA4A0F876042FD869@TYAPR01MB6315.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 12:40 PM [email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 8:49 AM Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I've attached an updated patch.
> >
> > While trying this idea, I noticed there is no API to get the length of
> > dlist, as we discussed offlist. Alternative idea was to use List
> > (T_XidList) but I'm not sure it's a great idea since deleting an xid
> > from the list is O(N), we need to implement list_delete_xid, and we
> > need to make sure allocating list node in the reorder buffer context.
> > So in the patch, I added a variable, catchange_ntxns, to keep track of
> > the length of the dlist. Please review it.
> >
>
> Thanks for your patch. Here are some comments on the master patch.

Thank you for the comments.

>
> 1.
> In catalog_change_snapshot.spec, should we use "RUNNING_XACTS record" instead of
> "RUNNING_XACT record" / "XACT_RUNNING record" in the comment?
>
> 2.
> +                * Since catchange.xip is sorted, we find the lower bound of
> +                * xids that sill are interesting.
>
> Typo?
> "sill" -> "still"
>
> 3.
> +        * This array is set once when restoring the snapshot, xids are removed
> +        * from the array when decoding xl_running_xacts record, and then eventually
> +        * becomes an empty.
>
> +                       /* catchange list becomes an empty */
> +                       pfree(builder->catchange.xip);
> +                       builder->catchange.xip = NULL;
>
> Should "becomes an empty" be modified to "becomes empty"?
>
> 4.
> + * changes that are smaller than ->xmin. Those won't ever get checked via
> + * the ->committed array and ->catchange, respectively. The committed xids will
>
> Should we change
> "the ->committed array and ->catchange"
> to
> "the ->committed or ->catchange array"
> ?

Agreed with all the above comments. These are incorporated in the
latest v4 patch I just sent[1].

Regards,

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoAyNPrOFg%2BQGh%2B%3D4205TU0%3DyrE%2BQyMgzStkH85uBZXptQ%...

--
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/





view thread (136+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns
  In-Reply-To: <CAD21AoAG9v-YPaSxJjZK0uNOfY5onAXJbqkW=g33oGf7tJHZDg@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox