public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]>
To: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: Jan Wieck <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Initial COPY of Logical Replication is too slow
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 11:57:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD21AoB4_n7+s=uM9apX1JVtvGvgM8ismAx_uMxvDmUXfQULsw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA4eK1Jkouj=w+PHzMB6v890ES3QOLf=cUTvZmGFr-WMQW2OnA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAB-JLwbBFNuASyEnZWP0Tck9uNkthBZqi6WoXNevUT6+mV8XmA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD21AoA6i2ui8FMZeuU_KxX4t-fM8G==zTW2Dp6-goujttrpew@mail.gmail.com>
<CAB-JLwZpp=7c9_r0beWWJxRh2BS_2Vvth8UDv7H57DBeaqggVg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD21AoDT3sL2COprsRumM9zEpL1Bk5VWboK4V2mRnjGua8xfeA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD21AoDQM62GOtaTzD_CVMSsFhv6o9c0Au1dSM1QuxeKFkWAKw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD21AoCz7HjEr3oeb=haK31YHxHZLcvD_wx_a-+xLPKywq++3A@mail.gmail.com>
<TY4PR01MB16907733B75A99117F013AFCA947FA@TY4PR01MB16907.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAD21AoA9YgiY1rVKMPZwB00WU_G4UfzoawY=7hyd7hpvBPcK6w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1KoSi60dtakJzn0MxNnHF1Yf4indSAffTjJxQG_31jsgQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD21AoB4B3MOxJ7-v9YLjV5fTOtaLRUhX3jN3kqhEi7D7-uY4A@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAD21AoCmHpKrNg9D3mcOA973CZ5N_dBLxb8pERpSxEeRLSQxpA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD21AoAEVyxwn_bMWHvcU-Gcz3aUVjAtMbdgfoJ8MZNiLLEh0g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1Jkouj=w+PHzMB6v890ES3QOLf=cUTvZmGFr-WMQW2OnA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 3:47 AM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 4:59 AM Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 3:31 PM Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > I've attached the patch to implement this idea. The patch still
> > introduces a new function but it overloads
> > pg_get_publication_tables(). We might be able to handle different
> > input (array or text) in pg_get_publication_tables() better, but it's
> > enough for discussion at least.
> >
>
> *
> + /*
> + * We can pass relid to pg_get_publication_table_info() since
> + * version 19.
> + */
> + appendStringInfo(&cmd,
> + "SELECT DISTINCT"
> + " (CASE WHEN (array_length(gpt.attrs, 1) = c.relnatts)"
> + " THEN NULL ELSE gpt.attrs END)"
> + " FROM pg_publication p,"
> + " LATERAL pg_get_publication_tables(p.pubname, %u) gpt,"
> + " pg_class c"
> + " WHERE c.oid = gpt.relid"
> + " AND p.pubname IN ( %s )",
> + lrel->remoteid,
> + pub_names->data);
>
> Why in the above query we need a join with pg_publication? Can't we
> directly pass 'pub_names' and 'relid' to pg_get_publication_tables()
> to get the required information?
Since the 'pub_names' is the list of publication names we cannot
directly pass it to the pg_get_publication_tables(). But if we make
pg_get_publication_tables() take {pubname text[], target_relid oid}
instead of {pubname text, target_relid oid}, yes. And it seems to help
somewhat simplify the patch. If having both
pg_get_publication_tables(VARIADIC text[]) and
pg_get_publication_tables(text[], oid) is not odd, it would be worth
trying it.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
view thread (51+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Initial COPY of Logical Replication is too slow
In-Reply-To: <CAD21AoB4_n7+s=uM9apX1JVtvGvgM8ismAx_uMxvDmUXfQULsw@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox