MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CADzfLwW9QczZW-E=McxcjUv0e5VMDctQNETbgao0K-SimVhFPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <202505181556.3n6oiowvntyr@alvherre.pgsql>
In-Reply-To: <202505181556.3n6oiowvntyr@alvherre.pgsql>
From: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 18:09:29 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CADzfLwXKtriMnfCNVGNH2ahwXaByjo-QOMWiDTU-9WZqh+zQ5g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro_Herrera?= <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
 Andrey Borodin <amborodin86@gmail.com>,
	Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>,
	Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CADzfLwXKtriMnfCNVGNH2ahwXaByjo-QOMWiDTU-9WZqh%2BzQ5g%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hello, =C3=81lvaro!

> I didn't understand why you have a few "v19" patches and also a separate
> series of "v19-only-part-3-" patches.  Is there duplication?  How do
> people know which series comes first?

This was explained in the previous email [0]:

> Patch itself contains 4 parts, some of them may be reviewed/committed
> separately. All commit messages are detailed and contain additional
> explanation of changes.

> To not confuse CFBot, commits are presented in the following way: part
> 1, 2, 3 and 4. If you want only part 3 to test/review =E2=80=93 check the
> files with "patch_" extensions. They differ a little bit, but changes
> are minor.

If you have an idea of a better way to handle it, please share. Yes,
the current approach is a bit odd.

> I think it would be better to get the PDF poster in a wiki page ... in
> fact I would suggest to Andrey that he could start a wiki page with all
> the PDFs presented at the conference.  Distributing a bunch of 2 MB pdf
> via the mailing list doesn't sound too great an idea to me.  A few
> people are having trouble with email quotas in cloud services, and the
> list server gets bothered because of it.  Kindly don't do that anymore.

Oh, you're right=E2=80=94I just didn't think of that. My bad, sorry about t=
hat.

Best regards,
Mikhail.

[0]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CADzfLwVOcZ9mg8gOG%2BKXWurt=
%3DMHRcqNv3XSECYoXyM3ENrxyfQ%40mail.gmail.com#52c97e004b8f628473124c05e3bf2=
da1