MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAJpy0uBT8JbEGE0xvm-Wxh1g_VVgC=whKqChZo-uB+VOa_YCTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE9k0Pkk6q72X3Rc3MUo7PxU46UcCzLfMhM02PGDUmAue9cDGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <TY4PR01MB17718104B91F2945BE727467694102@TY4PR01MB17718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAE9k0P=dgCEaKE6+vSCQp8TgrYOi_RqQkDTScdWzFSECsPQn9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJpy0uAdBxGpc4wtj-LcTGMNkVCYu4eMbDr27snEO_SrN2cV4A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJpy0uAdBxGpc4wtj-LcTGMNkVCYu4eMbDr27snEO_SrN2cV4A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 11:38:48 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CAE9k0PmOURa4Yi3sYFb6PG7PuJGi9zBd9nAcJ3A5-_N_qn8xew@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with
 quorum-based synchronous replication
To: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>,
 Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
	Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>,
 SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAE9k0PmOURa4Yi3sYFb6PG7PuJGi9zBd9nAcJ3A5-_N_qn8xew%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 3:32=E2=80=AFPM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com=
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 2:57=E2=80=AFPM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail=
.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So my preferred behavior would be:
> >
> > 1) duplicate names: normalize, do not error
> > 2) after normalization, if num_sync > unique_slots: error immediately
> >
>
> Thanks for tha pathces. I have attached a patch (txt file) with a few
> trivial changes, take it if you find the changes acceptable.
>

Thanks, I will review it and share my feedback.

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.