public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Junwang Zhao <[email protected]>
To: Amit Langote <[email protected]>
Cc: Chao Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Haibo Yan <[email protected]>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Eliminating SPI / SQL from some RI triggers - take 3
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 19:56:10 +0800
Message-ID: <CAEG8a3K5ayVNkCDnK9OtNb+4OY0chJtW6ObgEOSFjqyymQda8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+HiwqHdB0r8z6Mut13BxpYNq2W-os+Arju4mcZbCyU9PeaVog@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+HiwqF4C0ws3cO+z5cLkPuvwnAwkSp7sfvgGj3yQ=Li6KNMqA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqGM6nvAV5O+=Nr+BXMPWOma0oeCRVzVP0XiLE8zX5TVAg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqGMaovCUgDbGxVGnK0Mrivr+ph3YE2Ws+47-ugyPb4f7g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFj8pRDaiBe_GOLk_yyYHTtPiDAAaLOM8u1-=Q3ZgXBTH+1igg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqGA5Ay_MR0eJEEbt4j6WrVh4F+AasTp8yCbs5aJLOJn6Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEG8a3JM=NoqiTK0V6S9FNxZPvy1+C5F7rfafTtPKBVWnunL-g@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqEyiLCY6MTLbOJXDdLNNQLaURYHvdW797MQgbjEK9od4Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEG8a3+VBpwPf1Rm-ECD90whM9b3YnGhux5CVXdsL6khiBfzRQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqF2UHzF0sKCp-F2a-U29rqh_9ZPy=f1h+Fh_=M8efj3pg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEG8a3L9Ew-WL8sxLROVOcypeaENPmd8qCmMvz4geoGL1TDGCA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEG8a3+nUFQo4sdPQF9xy0J73J8RFJ5U9A5+_kMosGDaZ+1sXA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAEG8a3JyKdizWvYsF+z_mA1BKy=dpW11iKVMOG=bk6Tbz6M1Bw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEG8a3+Hf4tvvbts29_k_AFhWQmRYfEo_SW4C5FY_140iKghBw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqFV-PY-3BxM6j5TaAiC3AwedDxo-6vwRSbvygg3zF+xAQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqHpaisS-e+0gAgzh92qZAFxncAJMmmTRZZN=efoeTPgOg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqFwZ6WLRbY8R7VC7JVp5Jot6ktZOkr9wDxTjoK=W1SgdQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqF_Kz=R8juHJBiOATvabWSOugK4VaGOxoJ_n=E2c7UM9w@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqHCB7kcbspkhaLN9enoj5x=ehzhFM4PXDgWUUP8Px41GA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CA+HiwqHpVtP485wEKuXdOkdoZWhvVvfFH40-og07Jp3MPx21eg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEG8a3JWHkJSXe9nNcVK7wnYKUEqWuMGFDhy5BynB_9tEjmEUg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqFjfumKrWy03q5M309xJJVYt0WgGfH6AZ8BjFhSwppwsQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEG8a3JjP1LaKSv-r3AMJLRyLMzENJrKshWsDvDouMPM_sizmA@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqFQ+ZA7hSOygv4uv_t75B3r0_gosjadetCsAEoaZwTu6g@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+HiwqHdB0r8z6Mut13BxpYNq2W-os+Arju4mcZbCyU9PeaVog@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 5:51 PM Amit Langote <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 5:51 PM Amit Langote <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 12:54 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > + if (riinfo->fpmeta == NULL)
> > > + {
> > > + /* Reload to ensure it's valid. */
> > > + riinfo = ri_LoadConstraintInfo(riinfo->constraint_id);
> > >
> > > I was thinking of wrapping the reload in a conditional check like
> > > `!riinfo->valid`, since `riinfo` can be valid even when `fpmeta == NULL`.
> > > However, `if (riinfo->fpmeta == NULL)` should rarely be true, so the
> > > unconditional reload is harmless, and the code is cleaner.
> > >
> > > +1 to the fix.
> >
> > Thanks for checking.
> >
> > I have just pushed a slightly modified version of that.
> >
> > > > 0002 is the rebased batching patch.
> > >
> > > The change of RI_FastPathEntry from storing riinfo to fk_relid
> > > makes sense to me. I'll do another review on 0002 tomorrow.
> >
> > Here's another version.
> >
> > This time, I have another fixup patch (0001) to make FastPathMeta
> > self-contained by copying the FmgrInfo structs it needs out of
> > RI_CompareHashEntry rather than storing pointers into it. This avoids
> > any dependency on those cache entries remaining stable. I'll push
> > that once the just committed patch has seen enough BF animals.
>
> Pushed.
>
> > 0002 is rebased over that.
>
> Rebased again.
+static void
+ri_FastPathBatchFlush(RI_FastPathEntry *fpentry, Relation fk_rel)
+{
+ /* Reload; may have been invalidated since last batch accumulation. */
+ const RI_ConstraintInfo *riinfo = ri_LoadConstraintInfo(fpentry->conoid);
...
+ if (riinfo->fpmeta == NULL)
+ {
+ /* Reload to ensure it's valid. */
+ riinfo = ri_LoadConstraintInfo(riinfo->constraint_id);
+ ri_populate_fastpath_metadata((RI_ConstraintInfo *) riinfo,
+ fk_rel, idx_rel);
+ }
ri_LoadConstraintInfo is currently invoked twice within
ri_FastPathBatchFlush. Should we eliminate the second call?
Alternatively, we could refactor ri_FastPathBatchFlush to accept
an additional parameter, `const RI_ConstraintInfo *riinfo`, so we
can remove the need for the first call. In that case, we need to call
ri_LoadConstraintInfo in ri_FastPathEndBatch.
>
> --
> Thanks, Amit Langote
--
Regards
Junwang Zhao
view thread (63+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Eliminating SPI / SQL from some RI triggers - take 3
In-Reply-To: <CAEG8a3K5ayVNkCDnK9OtNb+4OY0chJtW6ObgEOSFjqyymQda8Q@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox