MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACJufxH0RxsxUQnAT2AVG08JFpA3C60L91_cEMM8JQd8P=12ow@mail.gmail.com>
 <1807434.1726668657@sss.pgh.pa.us> <CACJufxEqJyD0o6t9f1NLp2cgaUeyRzNv+PiDuKnrP1xekHFYyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACJufxEF9_o_tZeNg+rDV5MfQW6eYTdM9MUcy0Z5-VMWvf-tOw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACJufxEF9_o_tZeNg+rDV5MfQW6eYTdM9MUcy0Z5-VMWvf-tOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:51:49 +0800
Message-ID: <CAEG8a3KQyeNvezSS3M3qAHykaDV9uPvTDp9i9+g+GvvDS4W7ug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: attndims, typndims still not enforced, but make the value within
 a sane threshold
To: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, 
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEG8a3KQyeNvezSS3M3qAHykaDV9uPvTDp9i9%2Bg%2BGvvDS4W7ug%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 10:11=E2=80=AFAM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.c=
om> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:35=E2=80=AFPM jian he <jian.universality@gmail=
.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The last time this was discussed, I think the conclusion was
> > > we should remove attndims and typndims entirely on the grounds
> > > that they're useless.  I certainly don't see a point in adding
> > > more logic that could give the misleading impression that they
> > > mean something.
> > >
>
>
> attached patch removes attndims and typndims entirely.
> some tests skipped in my local my machine, not skipped are all OK.

Should you also bump the catalog version?

--=20
Regards
Junwang Zhao