MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CALdSSPgu6fnoOYzgiFF4_Etr96zEHvSwvYJDemc3o++EZbUQMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEvyyTjUTLXvrme3CNMjJYwA9j4usrq53PyBPv47Apk58Qz+GA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEvyyTjGtYRq3Aa0tY6=_QGV6z+6KTQVF=J75Acx2L6i0JOkGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoZRs3ArQC_rkVCx_Q7rWCM+QF-Q6ERRYUaN4tUvr+rd7w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+TgmoZRs3ArQC_rkVCx_Q7rWCM+QF-Q6ERRYUaN4tUvr+rd7w@mail.gmail.com>
From: lakshmi <lakshmigcdac@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 22:40:21 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CAEvyyThYHLTqQP7mebf=9C7EBSNJ6mMsrtvEmhbtDub3KQ0w4w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Use log_newpage_range in HASH index build
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>,
 pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e4e26b06507421e9"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEvyyThYHLTqQP7mebf%3D9C7EBSNJ6mMsrtvEmhbtDub3KQ0w4w%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

--000000000000e4e26b06507421e9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

> It is probably best to start a separate email thread specifically
> about this patch, because it's doing something quite different from
> the original patch. I suggest presenting some specific performance
> results, as it's not very clear how much benefit this might have. It
> might be good to test a favorable scenario and also an unfavorable
> scenario, describing and showing results for each.
>
>


> Thanks for the suggestion. I=E2=80=99ll start a separate thread for this =
patch
> with performance results.
>
> Regards,
> Lakshmi
>

--000000000000e4e26b06507421e9
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><p>Hi,</p></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote=
 gmail_quote_container"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0=
px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
It is probably best to start a separate email thread specifically<br>
about this patch, because it&#39;s doing something quite different from<br>
the original patch. I suggest presenting some specific performance<br>
results, as it&#39;s not very clear how much benefit this might have. It<br=
>
might be good to test a favorable scenario and also an unfavorable<br>
scenario, describing and showing results for each.<br>
<br><p></p></blockquote><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rg=
b(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><p>Thanks for the suggestion. I=E2=80=99ll=
 start a separate thread for this patch with performance results.</p><p>Reg=
ards,<br>Lakshmi</p>
</blockquote></div></div>

--000000000000e4e26b06507421e9--