public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Ashutosh Bapat <[email protected]>
To: Jeff Davis <[email protected]>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Conway <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [17] CREATE SUBSCRIPTION ... SERVER
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:21:37 +0530
Message-ID: <CAExHW5vDPBB_PShBmSj=v=Jf1K=vSmWdPZTzCJsLpqDgqek+sA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAExHW5vv-78ixJs3arsuZ+12A4AyqehJnDPhejp0m4FAKG6JZA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAExHW5sAo4Gv3AwuxQNGSQ2Z45B8_MZEb-SG-B8D-hLMdrquAg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CAExHW5unvpDv6yMSmqurHP7Du1PqoJFWVxeK-4YNm5EnoNJiSQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAExHW5sQVJeCgCGMkum_k4Z4VPaK5GkdAjHW-d+F3MngBZ9qBA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CALj2ACXDua2Az15Kj3OZFaRm49G8-faemiEEv8t9GNCcsxv8Hw@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAExHW5v5poohyfNRVQp3yjVE56ej0dWvVMbysSSVtg21aHT3uQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAExHW5vF+cp9efQj=-W+Rhbr9f9ZZqt3XFnP0NB5jKsm=C=5tw@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CAExHW5uCzS-VeSYQHTHxFSdQik-f_O892xmzrzm2fuO+ro+otA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:33 AM Jeff Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2024-01-22 at 18:41 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > 0002 adds a prefix "regress_" to almost every object that is created
> > in foreign_data.sql.
>
> psql \dew outputs the owner, which in the case of a built-in FDW is the
> bootstrap superuser, which is not a stable name. I used the prefix to
> exclude the built-in FDW -- if you have a better suggestion, please let
> me know. (Though reading below, we might not even want a built-in FDW.)
I am with the prefix. The changes it causes make review difficult. If
you can separate those changes into a patch that will help.
>
> > Dummy FDW makes me nervous. The way it's written, it may grow into a
> > full-fledged postgres_fdw and in the process might acquire the same
> > concerns that postgres_fdw has today. But I will study the patches
> > and
> > discussion around it more carefully.
>
> I introduced that based on this comment[1].
>
> I also thought it fit with your previous suggestion to make it work
> with postgres_fdw, but I suppose it's not required. We could just not
> offer the built-in FDW, and expect users to either use postgres_fdw or
> create their own dummy FDW.
I am fine with this.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
view thread (63+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [17] CREATE SUBSCRIPTION ... SERVER
In-Reply-To: <CAExHW5vDPBB_PShBmSj=v=Jf1K=vSmWdPZTzCJsLpqDgqek+sA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox