public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Ajin Cherian <[email protected]>
To: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
Cc: Давыдов Виталий <[email protected]>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:34:58 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFPTHDZNwMWfJZprw9jsoa4-19-h337KRY9Pt41PdNiQTTYaiQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFPTHDaz4cyRN3NbjYtkqCKFj7Dv1u0Z8wviY8fnJW4+0CkF_Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8fab8-65d74c80-1-2f28e880@39088166>
<CAA4eK1KOs3s6syZqUgrd2WvjTz64SGf0ToZcRoPMCKKH+M0YFQ@mail.gmail.com>
<99df2-65d8d200-1-63c26880@172687752>
<CAA4eK1KtjjPxe5tjWeGNf5CfF9qfceVQCCC9XGsKzR-ifQD9uA@mail.gmail.com>
<ba4b6-65ddc580-9-5c3e3080@134362348>
<CAA4eK1J6wOMkDDt3iOs+JqkvQvuwSORosTpqdejgvXqFmxex=A@mail.gmail.com>
<badcf-65dde500-3-24ba3c80@28790566>
<cedbe-65e0c000-1-6db17700@133269862>
<[email protected]>
<f9f1b-65e72c80-7-533dda00@76203995>
<CAFPTHDbU4EkVmKL66i5BzrmQ6LFftQPx_TZ1euKt9fvVzQDyjA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1+n7M2S1OpoGWDd+YZkDCuURMdVRbvP0eELQUvWgmDneg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFPTHDa=pJSZ_4dV5DPAOapRSgPcyyUTP0WzGY2Rz_D3-gwraw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1K1fSkeK=kc26G5cq87vQG4=1qs_b+no4+ep654SeBy1w@mail.gmail.com>
<OSBPR01MB2552707A847936E6803CFAA5F5092@OSBPR01MB2552.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAA4eK1KY=uwXXuVMtuNTYHGFbbXgDveoFoP3UbxNXqxCAx8GBQ@mail.gmail.com>
<OSBPR01MB25528F4B0B8178D3AA8DE2BFF5082@OSBPR01MB2552.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAA4eK1KNrm8xE-ZOAS249m+DOk=YQ_YaoM-GsZEvC8rTMtdW8w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFPTHDaz4cyRN3NbjYtkqCKFj7Dv1u0Z8wviY8fnJW4+0CkF_Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 4:26 PM Ajin Cherian <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Attaching the patch for your review and comments. Big thanks to Kuroda-san
> for also working on the patch.
>
>
Looking at this a bit more, maybe rolling back all prepared transactions on
the subscriber when toggling two_phase from true to false might not be
desirable for the customer. Maybe we should have an option for customers to
control whether transactions should be rolled back or not. Maybe
transactions should only be rolled back if a "force" option is also set.
What do people think?
regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia
view thread (11+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Slow catchup of 2PC (twophase) transactions on replica in LR
In-Reply-To: <CAFPTHDZNwMWfJZprw9jsoa4-19-h337KRY9Pt41PdNiQTTYaiQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox