public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>
To: zengman <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 07:57:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFj8pRAF1FjKE=OezxxtmLm6Tc3b+zEzBCQZqLLxdgw5Op-uPw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CA+renyXxanvX8rnrqTNkZt1r9=rm59MHSG4DDVfsV2aUGe3dUQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAFj8pRAH17WO_d9nUWAsV8MXVAVC18Jmn7f+KxGfakEHFY33Xg@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>

so 20. 12. 2025 v 5:23 odesílatel zengman <[email protected]> napsal:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I've noticed this interesting feature and would like to modify this test
> case to clarify that we fall back to the original logic when inlining
> fails.
> This is a small change that doesn't touch core code. What do you all think?
>

+1

I think so message of warning should be enhanced -

"test_inline_in_from_support_func called with non-TEXT parameters" is messy
little bit.

Regards

Pavel



>
> Regards
> Man Zeng

view thread (19+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify
  In-Reply-To: <CAFj8pRAF1FjKE=OezxxtmLm6Tc3b+zEzBCQZqLLxdgw5Op-uPw@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox