Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tqKxS-003EpY-E2 for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2025 23:48:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tqKxR-00Dmb2-0n for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2025 23:48:53 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tqKxQ-00DmXm-Il for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2025 23:48:52 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tqKxM-001OWJ-1s for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2025 23:48:51 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-547bcef2f96so1504482e87.1 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2025 15:48:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jeltef.nl; s=google; t=1741304928; x=1741909728; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=em4deI9jkBIjEF3mvBtSQb/d0ebDZb+brgvcdhsYUPE=; b=kroTl9jWlcIPI4tuuJhQ6WB9R0MvTrrinNlX4agaOgsq5YiuvxfvmJpBgd4GXcKhDV lPPZvA1lpB3Yv1MB69pKk5BQ7szUI7fyH/MuH/+9Aw6MnmVcxvErZ0ANCZWHOMG25ZGj BcC9IRT8ZccFYso/VStlkTegXAhE5xZLdDjosv8uXOwotdWVXPFXi4QNJ1IiKJtu2bZZ +XomUhAn5E7tQx6NF/xFSeoThR2NDovEyyivp8dcoyIkD0CqBUkNKR/Hr4UqJ2neoGly XeZHLNpxRmf53n4LvQr7TSeFc+t6a7ZwuJqW8plQbHpZsw1mAGbbiJ8ZRTGqjR5N2gZl 1daA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741304928; x=1741909728; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=em4deI9jkBIjEF3mvBtSQb/d0ebDZb+brgvcdhsYUPE=; b=ADtlv3xBu/YS/r9gogLUcA0VFtUj82PIly018dy5XGYUsLws7YuR5J2bZ2mfIg6hol 0xOPl/aOejZNm7+m/07wZRhs1udG8aKjpAY4SyP0o2hwDq6z9Qzf+eAjv2nRSdidldpd FtWogC0rVvvm7xEjVXO6JKzWmMo2zvZUnKgrO4OA1QrQYtQ21j0sbtPGrmgDPP/ZQLYI U5uqDLWBs/ADCn7JbcOQB9i1bb0nUttrLvfZYIxeYDAoCXfDh62EfsJLI3XwoQiri/pu Y+zvCDwg4ZOsJgzbd6SP0a5L/4ScS40FwNSUinzIVAjUQdliAYUaFc1v543Yt2k7Fh6b xp0w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXx8vVfDqPifNCrLHuFShH7tAUNfr6fLH71XRafdV19mxd3z20GfQjLF/kqggTya843jvJ7LSHddCUporwk@lists.postgresql.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyla/Otbckbq/26pt/A7UdUSThZLodmIjAvMBbdk9jlANYHcjdD fNpPDRdZArBzIpi11lNsZ74DFCCkzFXovwc4nqQeU1TFXzMEV7pIgDeOI30aCvsaOXr2xrrgd3b qMuI4BLXaUFR/gM3ixornV+LkjOH5rsHUoHhWUQCJAhl+2YFQ X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvxHHLw+RTeb2YSh90c0vnXcNRzCniQWehnlmVU8XscGujtsDkswAf/1ZTkD0A iMEB8J5Rr5+fCn6L2dNi+nmceink1svW+QkZ6B+gbzD6GWcWfFrCTae33EHGNde/IwoGpx691aj bjOZp2x6MOd6ruPRafNcEra0lLl2s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGzVAI8sfo4UsXZ2iSzM+h/Su6quiZDHRqgfJ5hHLL8MZ7zmPTwC8k/m5YaNL0iXW+RsTsx4vxo8W5nJweZp0E= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5fee:0:b0:549:91c6:970d with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-54991c6973cmr179260e87.5.1741304928119; Thu, 06 Mar 2025 15:48:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <703819.1741281033@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: From: Jelte Fennema-Nio Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 00:48:36 +0100 X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JrtQm_8f5xQ65YAUA5IuKwFUkLH2CiEbGzqlX7GrYYPtZSzozwfAwC8T_c Message-ID: Subject: Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements To: Tom Lane Cc: vignesh C , PostgreSQL Hackers , Jacob Brazeal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 18:39, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 18:10, Tom Lane wrote: > > Please see if you can make it use patch(1). IME git is too > > stiff-necked about slightly stale patches no matter which > > subcommand you use. > > It was using patch(1) in the past for that reason, but with --3way I > was able to get "git apply" to apply patches that patch(1) was unable > to apply. Also with the git command you get much more useful conflict > output. Okay, I went for the approach of just trying everything until one works. Starting with "git am", then patch(1), and as a final attempt "git apply". Patch 5272 applies correctly now. I've removed any backoff caused by repeated failures for all existing patches, so all should be retried in the next ~48 hours.