MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <aFLp9sMEHFHULOFx@nathan>
 <CAGRkXqTp9k_7X1OqqQSnVfoyGxAM3SQ083CcyaezBg9qQ8i+qg@mail.gmail.com>
 <aFRzYhOTZcRgKPLu@nathan> <aFS6m1tNH2sGMQ61@paquier.xyz>
 <aFWznvZtYZ3VJxgi@nathan>
 <aFiWUzW8VChL-hGg@paquier.xyz> <aFl1AB9ofnQrrckV@nathan>
 <aFn82kXgvwKHncs-@paquier.xyz>
 <aFrSlSz9fi47j5Sr@nathan> <aFtRd1Q4QuCWcg5k@paquier.xyz>
 <aFwT31Rw-Oj-bgO9@nathan>
In-Reply-To: <aFwT31Rw-Oj-bgO9@nathan>
From: shihao zhong <zhong950419@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 13:12:02 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAGRkXqStMeemxvmTKxKxb5eD+pWNnLLDYGe1qOEF9EwKh+Gp_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fixes inconsistent behavior in vacuum when it processes multiple
 relations
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGRkXqStMeemxvmTKxKxb5eD%2BpWNnLLDYGe1qOEF9EwKh%2BGp_A%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

> Attached is the remaining patch for HEAD, planned once v19 opens, and
> the tests I have used on the back-branches as a txt to not confuse the
> CI, for reference.

Just want to make sure, are we not going to include my original test
to catch the future regression? Also, could someone please let me know
how to check if the test is stable or not?

Thanks