MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E1w7pJ5-002Q6p-10@gemulon.postgresql.org>
 <CA+TgmoYsu2+YAo9eLGkDp5VP-pfQ-jOoX382vS4THKHeRTNgew@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGQGwEhtaT6qe5fN--t6HhTwBvBoZUukx-NVPpEMG9uFWHHvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoYwebE37qZwcNE9MKT4rt3ymP2s1M6KyRK_MGkxCYZMeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGQGwFARNb_2J1Skvw5RQSsyhqUqWQgQJNDhP+v-7fzinLfOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoZ2+HQess2QSuZp1si17CDHw165PQROaFq0skcKJS20-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGQGwFf+cpgw3T=NsGF8cxm4zx74AMCdajDda2Z7OXq9YM1mQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA4eK1+VwGQb5T7xH5AXS0XknGGCAVZQLbBcjq9DZikJhViX2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA4eK1+4wS-XY6qbhEyiF97Wc_o_t==5uzkZmZ3nKVDhpQpdOg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAA4eK1+4wS-XY6qbhEyiF97Wc_o_t==5uzkZmZ3nKVDhpQpdOg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 12:54:41 +0900
Message-ID: 
 <CAHGQGwGdfn4UPF8TmDPF5CinbrtxyUCHyny_ZuXHwXgSPyb2-w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Reduce log level of some logical decoding messages from
 LOG to D
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHGQGwGdfn4UPF8TmDPF5CinbrtxyUCHyny_ZuXHwXgSPyb2-w%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 7, 2026 at 12:33=E2=80=AFPM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.co=
m> wrote:
> The other possibility is to use AmRegularBackendProcess() to decide
> the log_level in this case.

Yes, that makes sense.

(I replied the same idea before seeing this message, sorry for the duplicat=
ion.)

Regards,

--=20
Fujii Masao