On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 10:11 AM SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM
<satyanarlapuram@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the patches, I combined these changes in my latest patch. Please find the v5.

Thanks for updating the patch! But, v5 patch caused a compilation failure.

slotfuncs.c:119:32: error: too few arguments to function call, single
argument 'try_disable' was not specified
  119 |                         ReplicationSlotDropAcquired();
      |                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
../../../src/include/replication/slot.h:338:13: note:
'ReplicationSlotDropAcquired' declared here
  338 | extern void ReplicationSlotDropAcquired(bool try_disable);
      |             ^                           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
slotfuncs.c:207:32: error: too few arguments to function call, single
argument 'try_disable' was not specified
  207 |                         ReplicationSlotDropAcquired();
      |                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
../../../src/include/replication/slot.h:338:13: note:
'ReplicationSlotDropAcquired' declared here
  338 | extern void ReplicationSlotDropAcquired(bool try_disable);
      |             ^                           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
slotfuncs.c:922:32: error: too few arguments to function call, single
argument 'try_disable' was not specified
  922 |                         ReplicationSlotDropAcquired();
      |                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
../../../src/include/replication/slot.h:338:13: note:
'ReplicationSlotDropAcquired' declared here
  338 | extern void ReplicationSlotDropAcquired(bool try_disable);
      |             ^                           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3 errors generated.