MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAHut+Pt3t_tCYwDStkj5fG4Z=YXrHvPBA7iGdh745QipC5zKeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <aeDs7iZUox1bbKAK@alvherre.pgsql>
 <CAHut+Psq7qmQSQCZA_HZcFv9ADCHDUPqCyFuTKfPDU-GUGihhQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA4eK1LKQTHkVWdrS9vBfiaAf5kVuU-qOx_FD2u1F4zB9hz4PA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHut+Puic9YTrdj3B4BX1J-m=EJTtF5bhxk8cJpKJVrw6QWMLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALDaNm12mTxd10yHcf2SyDfkpbfWqHJb=m90cwfaEJnEBbPOXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALDaNm12mTxd10yHcf2SyDfkpbfWqHJb=m90cwfaEJnEBbPOXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:46:09 +1000
Message-ID: 
 <CAHut+PuTH35hTKaP_+wuUepAbuWC2YLizG1aqxjvJP_fPBFFVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+
To: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro_Herrera?= <alvherre@kurilemu.de>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuTH35hTKaP_%2BwuUepAbuWC2YLizG1aqxjvJP_fPBFFVQ%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

> >
> > PSA  v3 patches.
> >
> > v3-0001 - Fixed the TABLE describe footer titles as suggested.
> > - "Included in publications:"
> > - "Excluded from publications:"
> >
> > v3-0002 - Made similar footer title changes for SEQUENCE describe
> >
> > v3-0003 - Made similar footer title changes for SHCEMA describe. In
> > passing, I found that this \dn describe output was not even being
> > tested, so I added the missing regression test.
>
> I'm not sure separate patches are necessary for this change; it might
> be better to merge them into a single patch. Other than that, the
> changes look good.
>

I separated them because only the changes to TABLE \d had previously
been discussed.

If everyone thinks all changes are good, then I can combine them into one patch.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.