public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Aleksander Alekseev <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Joel Jacobson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add get_bytes() and set_bytes() functions
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:31:31 +0300
Message-ID: <CAJ7c6TNVbeNsxbbj1QJTcjdkHRmJUBfF=iv_dOMDAGxoKY9CyQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAJ7c6TPtOp6+kFX5QX3fH1SVr7v65uHr-7yEJ=GMGQi5uhGtcA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
Hi,
> +1
>
> I wanted this myself many times.
>
> I wonder if get_bytes() and set_bytes() will behave differently
> on little-endian vs big-endian systems?
>
> If so, then I think it would be nice to enforce a consistent byte order
> (e.g., big-endian), to ensure consistent behavior across platforms.
No, the returned value will not depend on the CPU endiness. Current
implementation uses big-endian / network order which in my humble
opinion is what most users would expect.
I believe we also need reverse(bytea) and repeat(bytea, integer)
functions e.g. for those who want little-endian. However I want to
propose them separately when we are done with this patch.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
view thread (3+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add get_bytes() and set_bytes() functions
In-Reply-To: <CAJ7c6TNVbeNsxbbj1QJTcjdkHRmJUBfF=iv_dOMDAGxoKY9CyQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox