Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q9OBH-0007YN-Fs for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:56:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q9OBG-0004FB-2f for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:56:50 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q9OBF-0004F1-OR for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:56:49 +0000 Received: from mail-oo1-xc32.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::c32]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1q9OBC-0028ya-MT for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:56:48 +0000 Received: by mail-oo1-xc32.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-559b0ddcd4aso442644eaf.0 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 03:56:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=timescale.com; s=google; t=1686740205; x=1689332205; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YH/UZ6FXyURgpRcGvSjCjVwgrBiCXDLCL/CcCfCcviI=; b=JDeRd1eEGdz2XpDKm7/OLZMo2pECd+aqGGD2kqqiWu1izZveGnphcb7OSXfZkV53Lp yOReIJrxfFlDabhQGJWhjhYNUgliQj7quA83DBBPgXLLJGdG4BNVJrHb6V9lIehyalZs Np6kmr0hkOg7/d7agR8T8VekZvufDnowB9+E7TBa/sk4KKWEvvEx3S7h6DxBsMKjysz9 I3CEtP1XsmepliHxsRqFghqijN5bfOXjVZ20D4Ww3qIk7RCZpylhMfvdYQn2C1ZTUfwT s/wb4V2WCO7GP/Qr/WWxiCCi5MIDtpWCbbuwqt98dapwqusfX89nFKA2QfRTqxwhu/+I PwOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686740205; x=1689332205; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=YH/UZ6FXyURgpRcGvSjCjVwgrBiCXDLCL/CcCfCcviI=; b=UBsM1MWFjVze+tRqvEa/WhdGbvjds1w8+hBBqAWwDS2rBt0vxsS45NMAcxPPOCDLkI kNiFHj+7BqlJ6DlPsC53IhwkTjbusQdeWXo6P+P+VqWJD2jRyzbkILqcCTQkv6bD4u90 3LPKwCrylHPSceZ+bgJUxUPlDMtXBMQwRzCd4qNgs0pAU+G2ZaqJLNXVFfZgEOIhZgLb bEFjOXvMi86mnGBBY3fedRowL3u7L/TANDo5I2XBP67ZHdJlSUOPINNB+Vs3o/FzKfjb zYMBRwhDcmZEOVEaorkerxx7IIg93eZrdyHQ5E+d+PSd+GLu4mjdyDY17wGhhPwVDNYZ o8tw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDz8h+7vYKkHyM89jBKpANSaB1RQZFN1HsVWe1yVTHDfEM9isKsW QsTr5HLL8YvUXinDBT3so0G41Qbo2mnXUBk2LLapwOU/f0cGbV4LjFg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5cRLUDeHDlTbTwDMPLnmIYV0kAHC8NMmKt0jdsUGNg53QE960gaoB55EFhhgbW/EVZiJxLiGvNfXMYS6PDcGI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:23cf:b0:398:450b:a8ab with SMTP id bq15-20020a05680823cf00b00398450ba8abmr11937333oib.45.1686740205714; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 03:56:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230206104917.sipa7nzue5lw2e6z@alvherre.pgsql> In-Reply-To: From: Aleksander Alekseev Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 13:56:34 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Pluggable toaster To: pgsql-hackers Cc: Pavel Borisov , Nikita Malakhov , Alvaro Herrera , Matthias van de Meent , vignesh C , Jacob Champion , Andres Freund , Robert Haas , Greg Stark , Teodor Sigaev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Hi, > > I have a question for the community - why was this patch silently put to a "rejected" status? > > Should there no be some kind of explanation? I wouldn't say that it happened "silently" nor that the reason is so mysterious [1]. [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAM-w4HPjg7NwEWBtXn1empgAg3fqJHifHo_nhgqFWopiYaNxYg%40mail.gmail.com -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev