public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: shveta malik <[email protected]>
To: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
Cc: Shlok Kyal <[email protected]>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <[email protected]>
Cc: Zsolt Parragi <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: shveta malik <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 08:58:02 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJpy0uA5mbois4MAtZ+AFg0h0R21H=-stzWa7eLd6Vj0tEO=WA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA4eK1+TLMqD0KdZEk6vETx2=62bx=uihKCFCOtTHTFN5h5Oyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFPTHDa5aP8ixTZBygGAe48E1N=DvuPzcXikw7bNKixLMN3pVg@mail.gmail.com>
<OS9PR01MB12149E188221BED862E4BE9E0F5342@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CALDaNm2-uwpbJ8fnrssp+hORvOutsqRoZAsa05xVVzXe5Bt3bw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFPTHDaNLRqPAda1RUDVfSDH7eLTaONv0UEmc9H5sdMW1Li2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAN4CZFOb3urMsLPsEyVrYR7-7yA+BC5kDgQQd0nAQ8xj2zyRcA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFPTHDYqpuZ6o2-HuCJDYqJ7GY3+zV+Xo-gT7PAgi4Bkz+oTxw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAN4CZFN4oLdxLwUXHUPV-5mFmK+4dcnppP00fV3i4qmMYCAkGA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFPTHDbBiTfjYkQwYTNA2a4LRp8Sp7_zB59fmV0R7977ztxgmg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFPTHDaftSwzGTGbFEw8rwDBsub0XqcDm1wxQcquj-Y3PC2qrg@mail.gmail.com>
<CANhcyEVercsNbgC5CTkMNzh_w_Jv1uK7RQg9vEvAeNQhoBHCKQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJpy0uAXynzWr4w_9GkJC3i=LL9WsRCZYVWAV0PgKmgs8riWzg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFPTHDavPyxsWjK0cRO3yOaP4u8FGYrOJuXJB-4wzneAY3H3Ug@mail.gmail.com>
<CANhcyEVFSutXXdt_0XMCD37NE7Yd7ROdDVEE06D8YVyPNEBFHg@mail.gmail.com>
<CANhcyEVd7eDKGtsrUqwZO5McTG4dsJ+X8OxO31Xgu6sWmo--hw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFPTHDbyVt_ggdi+rOP4=jBmgU=DDgYWuLxc4oQ6ux-T0H-ZBg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHWVJhGoi+2bzZDNxtnB8Xc+DuFKB=YvqC0Xoc_HfzcgHAwMUg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFPTHDbWKQjv4QfHaNiXosZ1TD0ZHc2hFyFFNB2RvLsJeJoH6g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAN4CZFPdFHwnew+wxt4UcXyjMYc3aXeR0XsR6_wZ=LEMGWEJFQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFPTHDYfDHQeQshXi7GDOQz3N8YdY6SNSmpoSAbnaQPBkVfv6A@mail.gmail.com>
<CANhcyEVV5A5qm9g7UVT99NpNqVsuzbzLsoteQ5gYOWvVsZsjCQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJpy0uAsgc5--4dCut2mmQd+Yxe-jfVQR=AY38dzeEe0+yaH4g@mail.gmail.com>
<OS9PR01MB12149E88B5ABBA9AEC715CBF2F5FF2@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAA4eK1JtjsJiu+2cfWQ2dw883=Ks6c1TeTtJSs_mHVBFBo1aag@mail.gmail.com>
<OS9PR01MB121494C7792D4CB38DE67A0DDF5FF2@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAA4eK1+TLMqD0KdZEk6vETx2=62bx=uihKCFCOtTHTFN5h5Oyw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 4:12 PM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 3:37 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Fair point but isn't it sufficient to check the tracked_origins rather
> > > than all origins? In docs of max_active_replication_origins, we say:
> > > "Setting it to a lower value than the current number of tracked
> > > replication origins (reflected in pg_replication_origin_status) will
> > > prevent the server from starting." which suggests here we should have
> > > a tight check of tracked_origins against
> > > max_active_replication_origins.
> >
> > Basically it sounds good, but it can slightly change the behavior if the old node
> > has some subscriptions which have never been enabled. Till now, we just counted
> > the number of subscriptions, thus we took into account them [1]. But after the
> > patch they can be ignored; IIUC pg_upgrade can succeed in the case.
> >
> > If the change is OK, we can proceed with your (and Shlok-san's) idea.
> >
> > [1]: reproducer is below.
> > 1. initialized old node with max_active_replication_origins=1
> > 2. created two subscriptions with (connect=false)
> > 3. initialized new node with max_active_replication_origins=1
> > 4. ran pg_upgrade and it did error-out
> >
> > ```
> > $ pg_upgrade -b /usr/local/pgsql/bin/ -d old/ -D new/ -U postgres
> > Performing Consistency Checks
> > -----------------------------
> > ...
> > Checking new cluster configuration for subscriptions
> > "max_active_replication_origins" (1) must be greater than or equal to the number of subscriptions (2) in the old cluster
> > Failure, exiting
> > ```
> >
>
> Yes, I understand this case but I feel the old check is more
> restrictive than required. We might want to even back-patch this small
> part in future if we see any such user complaint.
>
Okay, makes sense.
thanks
Shveta
view thread (45+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CAJpy0uA5mbois4MAtZ+AFg0h0R21H=-stzWa7eLd6Vj0tEO=WA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox