public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shveta malik <[email protected]>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <[email protected]>
Cc: Shlok Kyal <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <[email protected]>
Cc: SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: shveta malik <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:43:19 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJpy0uCKaqD-UfCX=Q5WkdtxUS8ZCJwLduegi5Etdx7gkV-02g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9k0PkxvD_Rbz1qm3ZHOX_n-JXaOiPV2wusvb6KVwQqifpt6w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJpy0uBT8JbEGE0xvm-Wxh1g_VVgC=whKqChZo-uB+VOa_YCTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE9k0Pkk6q72X3Rc3MUo7PxU46UcCzLfMhM02PGDUmAue9cDGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<TY4PR01MB17718104B91F2945BE727467694102@TY4PR01MB17718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
	<CAE9k0P=dgCEaKE6+vSCQp8TgrYOi_RqQkDTScdWzFSECsPQn9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<TY4PR01MB17718F364B2CB8108B34FA5FC94112@TY4PR01MB17718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
	<CAJpy0uCnasi4MSQB=nrjPSv4U_0rb2Z-cg_wazUGQ-P_VnRZeA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1JLwL_aauy+nrrobC3Sftv369N3N6DaidBpNJdiOwXG+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJpy0uBR-8-d__LgfqqUbFvLBvzL6bY_kjUmBWAVsLLu1QZEPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE9k0P=uMVGV5TXTVdjKzu+0gFLMKHNY2usnAzK0L2cjbmPHBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANhcyEWcziK1eR=A4_TW_PbeBAgfBacck2R=sYOqAs5=5g+2=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE9k0PkxvD_Rbz1qm3ZHOX_n-JXaOiPV2wusvb6KVwQqifpt6w@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks for the patches.

1)
I see that there are 2 files now with 053*,  we shall move ours to 054.
ls t/053*
t/053_standby_login_event_trigger.pl
t/053_synchronized_standby_slots_quorum.pl

2)
I feel this test can be removed:
+# PART F: Plain list with first-prefixed slot name still means ALL mode

It is not a test for synchronized_standby_slots, IMO, it is testing
the syncrep parser. Or let me know if my understanding is wrong?

thanks
Shveta






view thread (28+ messages)  latest in thread

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication
  In-Reply-To: <CAJpy0uCKaqD-UfCX=Q5WkdtxUS8ZCJwLduegi5Etdx7gkV-02g@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox