On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 02:02:10PM -0600, Sami Imseih wrote:
> I am OK with moving away from "jumble" in-lieu of something else, but my thoughts are we should actually call this process "fingerprint"
I agree fingerprint is the right final word. But "jumble" conveys the *process* better than "fingerprinting". I view it as jumbling produces an object that can be fingerprinted.
> For node attributes we can specify "fingerprint_ignore" or "no_fingerprint". What do you think?
Still should be jumble_ignore.
Cheers,
Greg