On Monday, April 13, 2026, Robert Treat &lt;<a href="mailto:rob@xzilla.net">rob@xzilla.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
I don&#39;t have a strong opinion on it, but I think generally that clean<br>
up patches (where we aren&#39;t fixing some kind of document mistake or<br>
misleading information) generally just go into HEAD for the next<br>
release, though if it easily applies cleanly to back branches and you<br>
want to do it, it&#39;s probably ok to apply it backwards, but I wouldn&#39;t<br>
spend any time on it if it didn&#39;t.<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I was under the impression that on both user-facing behavior changes grounds, and translation grounds, back-patching changes to existing messages is not allowed absent a true factual bug.</div><div><br></div><div>David J.</div><div><br></div>