MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALDaNm0YSiLpjCmajwLfidQrFOrLNKPQir7s__PeVvh9U3uoTQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87cz2otiw3.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org> <ZG/jlbT0eIME+MFW@paquier.xyz>
 <CALDaNm1sDD-MCW6zrxHCC7Ka5AzO-L4ejxeeTMtXPPN+F4vz2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <c44dfd51-96fe-d3aa-8f8a-07946d052fdc@dunslane.net> <CALDaNm3SWpFDTs1oRRbOAfYJNuSPMCLu4O3mLnU-tKoSFgGckQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZHu852YlGAk7AVk0@paquier.xyz> <CAA4eK1Kbyo-L3nfMnZbusgv_a7jejxcm1gsDBJ2VH5KnK1rkTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZH6wybg4hI6nHc6R@paquier.xyz> <CALDaNm2TK623jrGQomqwH1JFd8DdFSa9epoZJf279AXb1S2GGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZIKWBC18s+IY+J2e@paquier.xyz>
In-Reply-To: <ZIKWBC18s+IY+J2e@paquier.xyz>
From: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 08:42:04 +0530
Message-ID: <CALDaNm1kR=xNS=Aihq7fPYch3oXyzgFmjmjSwcCzBmCsqME33Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Implement generalized sub routine find_in_log for tap test
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, 
	=?UTF-8?Q?Dagfinn_Ilmari_Manns=C3=A5ker?= <ilmari@ilmari.org>, 
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1kR%3DxNS%3DAihq7fPYch3oXyzgFmjmjSwcCzBmCsqME33Q%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 08:31, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 06:43:44PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > Please find the attached patches that can be applied on back branches
> > too. v5*master.patch can be applied on master, v5*PG15.patch can be
> > applied on PG15, v5*PG14.patch can be applied on PG14, v5*PG13.patch
> > can be applied on PG13, v5*PG12.patch can be applied on PG12, PG11 and
> > PG10.
>
> Thanks.  The amount of minimal conflicts across all these branches is
> always fun to play with.  I have finally got around and applied all
> that, after doing a proper split, applying one part down to 14 and the
> second back to 11.

Thanks for pushing this.

Regards,
Vignesh