MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CALDaNm1zcLL514UaZ+Jxa0O9rLDzUAYf1nS3h0htKW9PwpfaLA@mail.gmail.com>
 <202503201639.e4siaal3wgnv@alvherre.pgsql>
In-Reply-To: <202503201639.e4siaal3wgnv@alvherre.pgsql>
From: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 18:15:38 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CALDaNm2R5x2C6ObvksZP_yZ+nJ=2PBPj0SWvmo0n2Lub3VDXAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>,
 Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
	Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm2R5x2C6ObvksZP_yZ%2BnJ%3D2PBPj0SWvmo0n2Lub3VDXAA%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 22:09, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Mar-20, vignesh C wrote:
>
> > Will it help the execution time if we use --jobs in case of pg_dump
> > and pg_restore wherever supported:
>
> As I said in another thread, I think we should enable this test to run
> without requiring any PG_TEST_EXTRA, because otherwise the only way to
> know about problems is to commit a patch and wait for buildfarm to run
> it.  Furthermore, I think running all 4 dump format modes is a waste of
> time; there isn't any extra coverage by running this test in additional
> formats.

+1 for running it in only one of the formats.

Regards,
Vignesh