public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vignesh C <[email protected]>
To: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 08:45:10 +0530
Message-ID: <CALDaNm3pqo_Ej6M5yE77y78TDJMXEP0_SChwaHzn_WNsfqp-3Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA4eK1JjfmfCz8evCpLx2EVKoH4m8rEgeRciEA7tMkjGx87cyQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALDaNm3=JrucjhiiwsYQw5-PGtBHFONa6F7hhWCXMsGvh=tamA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALDaNm1G0=0J2O+6pMStKuWUjxJJT5vbO-5jiUqzYVZM_sJ2+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALDaNm3Rc2KxGzLy-4qxFS+MWS6GN-ROVoPEb1MFA53W3iAqog@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1+rVhdxkwk76Rwyhxo_CHbR99GBvn8M9yhX2_xXgY8zWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALDaNm1v+jwrWLeYqANn7pfaka88BwUS2mrVTykSR8tJ8xQN1w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1JjfmfCz8evCpLx2EVKoH4m8rEgeRciEA7tMkjGx87cyQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 4:46 PM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 4:17 PM vignesh C <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:19 PM Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > For the second syntax (Alter Publication ...), isn't it better to
> > > avoid using ADD? It looks odd to me because we are not adding anything
> > > in publication with this sytax.
> >
> > I was thinking of the scenario where user initially creates the
> > publication for all tables:
> > CREATE PUBLICATION pub1 FOR ALL TABLES;
> >
> > After that user decides to skip few tables ex: t1, t2
> >  ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 ADD SKIP TABLE t1,t2;
> >
> > I thought of supporting this syntax if incase user decides to add the
> > skipping of a few tables later.
> >
>
> I understand that part but what I pointed out was that it might be
> better to avoid using ADD keyword in this syntax like: ALTER
> PUBLICATION pub1 SKIP TABLE t1,t2;

Currently we are supporting Alter publication using the following syntax:
ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 ADD TABLE t1;
ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 SET TABLE t1;
ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 DROP TABLE T1;
ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 ADD ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA sch1;
ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 SET ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA sch1;
ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 DROP ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA sch1;

I have extended the new syntax in similar lines:
ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 ADD SKIP TABLE t1;
ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 SET SKIP TABLE t1;
ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 DROP SKIP TABLE T1;

I did it like this to maintain consistency.
But I'm fine doing it either way to keep it simple for the user.

Regards,
Vignesh






view thread (368+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
  In-Reply-To: <CALDaNm3pqo_Ej6M5yE77y78TDJMXEP0_SChwaHzn_WNsfqp-3Q@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox