MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAMm1aWa8p=o60y1Z71bjAjWH8XH2Y+kZ6cNjQ21uK2_i65soOQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALj2ACUNnqY7oc5C5yGS1ZbHV1RtQgPGiMkPTm989czCDwag6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEze2Wh_+P9Hs4RQ=tc=70rdB5h0omGx5Kz-BLhsJPRnKQ+cWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMm1aWbuJLEnAjT4_1s8eArmZq=H7oi0Jv=J2GnRpBhkbC_PVw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMm1aWYWmqys2O7UekQ0=ZSWSpG9h2qoEW7w46yiWM0eO1Lu7g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALj2ACXsmvEDsHtADoQeDE-NVyBh4A-D80NmNanTUc37g=FQ-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMm1aWabDx3V9Hw5L2eB+6EOtr60QWDybZShQsYLCCMNF-es_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMm1aWaFmbc8QCbcPkG7ROV7gjshamS=sJRJd=oghLJM9uOnpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220319001556.atuqbmafvc73pa2k@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <CAMm1aWa_3N1Z2-_YwdNxfogs_rxzpu90VZeKjqwjerCVq9rQAw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220707000446.hefgyu5xikxwt4md@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <CAMm1aWbfFwT+Cf1eSrXtF2R8ffxXTbH=un8unQ8WbcpcbymnYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <d9546a13-dd86-57d8-3bb4-32136fbb3673@gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoaJEDirAMq_9q3B8PrXDf1h72S7hhPr4aotakYe9HLoLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALj2ACX5xK_X=MSBh_Qe518O7V5D2phnpXuSD9=-zAkGnyo9vA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+TgmoYCu6RpuJ3cZz0e7cZSfaVb=cr6iVcgGMGd5dxX0MYNRA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+TgmoYCu6RpuJ3cZz0e7cZSfaVb=cr6iVcgGMGd5dxX0MYNRA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:01:45 +0530
Message-ID: 
 <CALj2ACWdECKsYVqYDTyqCc6oVmHdT1sNYDcEJOv_YWbp5PfG9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Report checkpoint progress with pg_stat_progress_checkpoint (was:
 Report checkpoint progress in server logs)
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>,
	Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>,
 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
	Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>,
 Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>,
	Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACWdECKsYVqYDTyqCc6oVmHdT1sNYDcEJOv_YWbp5PfG9Q%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:49 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I also think that a new pg_stat_checkpoint view is needed
> > because, right now, the PgStat_CheckpointerStats stats are exposed via
> > the pg_stat_bgwriter view, having a separate view for checkpoint stats
> > is good here.
>
> Yep.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 11:44 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> > I also think that a new pg_stat_checkpoint view is needed
> > because, right now, the PgStat_CheckpointerStats stats are exposed via
> > the pg_stat_bgwriter view, having a separate view for checkpoint stats
> > is good here.
>
> I agree that we should do that, but largely independent of the architectural
> question at hand.

Thanks. I quickly prepared a patch introducing pg_stat_checkpointer
view and posted it here -
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACVxX2ii%3D66RypXRweZe2EsBRiPMj0aHfRfHUeXJcC7kHg%40mail.gmail.com.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com