From: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANxoLDejn2JFXF7kVMtcznW6XyessrJ7WToSaQau2GxBdAGSUg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CANxoLDfjQnhM=E6JSyYo9s9OdjqoN8s_3wE5yL=kaDu_X8j-dA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANxoLDcxmXNHNyPt5v+LaBJVJmyt=j95D7TDE9SepoM7y15t-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN4CZFNqf41TCg1ENccq6DAYQpArCbnKUSidHnRKaVMWGj5pBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANxoLDfL1AxL=k9SsRNReKQ-sJUSy6RvCqeog5HWckFxff=0Pg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN4CZFP5-fAGwxMCyKGePgp3N8NCpoFXkruO=5xjTC=gPwqYxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANxoLDc6UFMsyzbXKF8SpMoXdoKE=-yRPqtvyBMKKJ2zOUKX4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN4CZFMhnZyQsdLC5iZNego77JHJyP6J_4CpWu=99vKHCd-vzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANxoLDco7z7Fj7_pj_3YQLvjq8ZH2Ai4c3GcOamed01fZhJ77Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAB-JLwY=RYPJhdFid0YDqk1L1OQPuHFz9J2tOeeVCFLjov+Ktg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANxoLDdRts-F+QxL+wtM8529Z3+TUJku8PKy3WoxcWBs7zQJ-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAB-JLwbyzF+JRPCoLCf-H6dQ_1+-O_wBZcESRdC6_H2z+-d-gg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANxoLDcWwoWOxvmV_uBBUsbGf+_AZzBV1GkcjoX+omNpcrCNMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN4CZFM99cGopPJXD_t05+Y9CnocOOTipfXCzoAfBUFSC-i4+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANxoLDejn2JFXF7kVMtcznW6XyessrJ7WToSaQau2GxBdAGSUg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 14:56:37 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAN4CZFONwnCCdPyJ0ZdJYx=eGDgueBd5o_dZRyh1DNJw+tPhDg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_table_ddl() to reconstruct CREATE TABLE
 statements
To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAN4CZFONwnCCdPyJ0ZdJYx%3DeGDgueBd5o_dZRyh1DNJw%2BtPhDg%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

Thanks, I can confirm that only_foreign_keys works properly.

> Combining `only_foreign_keys=true` with `includes_foreign_keys=false` is
> rejected upfront since it would produce no output.

Shouldn't only_foreign_keys=true with include_constraints=false also error out?