MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAN4CZFPmF9fGOcFubwOxqXymhVo_RvbUx3bLoYQcfk=f0mwECw@mail.gmail.com>
 <202601281620.m3hrqtih5b2w@alvherre.pgsql>
 <CAN4CZFPUfTj-BF-m5=F7_MnY_T3+Qh-DuG7N7ojdbJDkT8JHeA@mail.gmail.com>
 <fd412b8e-fab5-43fe-b18d-3e035e4998a7@nataraj.su>
 <CAN4CZFMCh3vOWGPbU5pTB-bwnoAtgFuDJmGGv7z7xeez+WJiag@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN4CZFMGwGdMnxP07Rk2qrC9eGQt31Lrerrnk66vQuzRhDEwiw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOYmi+nTXGcroZD_Mnkc8LYWYFbfDYNR4ML_yQ5sF9+DY2amcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN4CZFMxQzFD0ZJS7pX5Ajdei7TmpROEZKG5vxmfmhCQEQX3fA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOYmi+mUdsTODm0F8PWBQYcCQPBKvHUAieXgoP1pWXtEA2N9Aw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOYmi+mUdsTODm0F8PWBQYcCQPBKvHUAieXgoP1pWXtEA2N9Aw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 22:46:34 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAN4CZFOdfRKjmpsDHWG_3Qgtmkcd41GFBH1uenC9-5yUj=hBzA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Custom oauth validator options
To: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro_Herrera?= <alvherre@kurilemu.de>,
	VASUKI M <vasukianand0119@gmail.com>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
 david.g.johnston@gmail.com,
	Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, myon@debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAN4CZFOdfRKjmpsDHWG_3Qgtmkcd41GFBH1uenC9-5yUj%3DhBzA%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

> (As one example, `SHOW
> my_validator.setting` isn't going to behave intuitively.)

Right, I didn't think about that scenario, it might be better to keep
this intentionally different.

That won't be the most user friendly option, but it is still
definitely better than not having the ability to configure this.