MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20250911054220.3784-1-root@ip-172-31-36-228.ec2.internal>
 <CANWCAZYZQw-nzTXbx3Bk332VtY9_D7ksDsuMZ0A-iDZ53yG7Ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK64mnfeWLBRbMfnOsag0vGTDnT84KJzpuei40nG0OHyw4SESw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANWCAZa1b2rcvoK657SmcKwh2P2cgASQ1D-0JPj5d3LbfaAVgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK64mneN20+sW5WhV+r7hMVo4Rd0z11B6=3L039rWMt1wK3nPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANWCAZZuS3sNgLRo8Z4AM=uY4zTmz=dH5D4Z9xV6K0CEuJ8Hdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK64mnejn9AZMYz03e7HX8Uui35PihUuOy=b+iBG=YtRKx0Log@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANWCAZZ_0AQMk1HgHXHX+JaeBfy_4kzwHgTdqMptDA7zM+nm+Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK64mnc6jbehHv5AHc84tVFRJg4zeMiFuvPX9xZkRpq0210MFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANWCAZY940P3wGOQAZWMLQL4MQGGyOu7WBjBEcn_gqcrr+NvAw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK64mne_oWN9d4mf+0c_5-4Emb9kRXA-OC05OJ4F_1fVqpjzDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANWCAZZcKYp+01u1QmkShfXVkUCCdxtJAgHT-61Vw0ALoWj47A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK64mne=Q_4VSpJ8f4RQB-yAThd4+i-BRYMvfdGOhvwJQdYoKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANWCAZYg2MVbYTaczNYNC2kaPodtfB8toUfE2Mhp9kut=2wzEA@mail.gmail.com> <CAK64mnd9NE+xE18shrf-SSx-iwMVof=2DJ2y9_fOkQ5E2Abc5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK64mnd9NE+xE18shrf-SSx-iwMVof=2DJ2y9_fOkQ5E2Abc5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:07:13 +0700
Message-ID: <CANWCAZbjdFnBiUmrBQC5vFFy0Fnn4SJG4AkkzGpTFhovodJdYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations
To: Andrew Kim <tenistarkim@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, 
	Oleg Tselebrovskiy <o.tselebrovskiy@postgrespro.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANWCAZbjdFnBiUmrBQC5vFFy0Fnn4SJG4AkkzGpTFhovodJdYQ%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 8:58=E2=80=AFAM Andrew Kim <tenistarkim@gmail.com> =
wrote:
> The removal of the backend-side checksum_backend_lib stanza without an
> equivalent dependency path explains the CI breakage clearly,
> and your diagnosis makes sense, v10-0003 approach,
> splitting the body of checksum_block into a semi-private
> implementation header while preserving the externally visible
> interface,
> that makes sense to me

Glad to hear it.

> I=E2=80=99m supportive of using v10 as the basis for further discussion a=
nd iteration,
> cleaning up Meson dependency declarations so generated headers are
> properly ordered,
> refining the PG_CHECKSUM_INTERNAL usage if needed,

Great!

It sounds like you've found some issues to address? It's not clear.

--=20
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services