Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyBeh-0004AD-QW for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 10:39:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyBeg-0006Wd-CM for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 10:39:34 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyBeg-0006WW-1F for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 10:39:34 +0000 Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyBeY-00080K-Mn for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 10:39:32 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id q205so14435899oig.13 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 02:39:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=enterprisedb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=myVgnYeUqYrZ1mHP5SM/EfxgXUOe1uiXIMJE3nTQgMA=; b=w6/QAfLrV9x8dowPcFqZGvN7iDictPU8cqx76jAkasTduLjlMJ9ZCbv81lV2AK4Tl1 bvxkTiZDhjQp6BSPhHmnY3maEpaL9H8ILr+ZpqtwOa8eg9xSb3P3PaVUEJ2wDpqP8bRH eDU5mO06hLbBOHqQfdFr60gYG/qhgI1eL69Y3EFc6NMUK/kGts9r0hTPzkpUvQGNToEE OUNJys9XO0F3aYFBWiA+DgJTIBHGVAt+OJs1b0wFuPKWa9GFjZCvHrBAMwxzCa1k9Ljk Zwg8mYQkohONygY9iIPWON0rKZ/aw/Ju3OJLGka7sY0B55mAtRPxVOs2hulMfkZ+v22P E6aw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=myVgnYeUqYrZ1mHP5SM/EfxgXUOe1uiXIMJE3nTQgMA=; b=S0B3kHhRjq21ZU8/xTWVBVrhXU2/lwM2bPOJmJCGoMJ4iCsHdjAiWTzYZU0lpRv+FE yDJXeutLjomhwpyPax0ZWF8ldLk495EraV0nCE68uEKgDEAD5EOtlvSDxMhMSxcJo+ef 5QDIFNRDraJcLJJltBSGLfXMqPhrrMepy0T1oCZRfU/YDqSdH0tVOw3HbjbEggXpISIS qKUMAZGyfOQbtk/tlcBy1hrS90+VUghwfWUFk6Vqy/2mif8FNO8tIxBjsMHG+gXoyQ++ bVEp9IjJIN4m+woe/aOUe8/GFEabtK4LB0d2P4MLjx5FEvFHdWbWMeTofG5sE6yUB2GL ak3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532VqvUTzT7bGXrnBdUdBYqUUlx+TOY+uPvOs4LehwHn7zb0uPjp 3jZLa+EX9rRkwks4xVCCYNl3NBnMkBqu+WZ/XG6yc3y0wfPFJUXy+Ups1An+IhbXeusbTWWOuDi wJSiwkLusfOjfUXSVTF46wIO/ZcL+6stm37DV1xF4OaEbVgDn8Mdz+AJBM19rYgGtHMDG1kq8KD xhskLHoBFDmGFZwxDI1fUbGXcNW9blvSvRys8k3qTG1s0r+bfxDMOM X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyNPKiQ9dNcxvKKWc9SW7JE4nD7qm/wYMsDX2CkqFpSK3ZklBg2JWgEfpzJKkuMwPkdt8nDdMHm6zauDpPEb3g= X-Received: by 2002:aca:33d5:: with SMTP id z204mr4723054oiz.81.1610188765976; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 02:39:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9550e917-c370-36a3-277f-2f25bfc1b497@2ndquadrant.com> <1c0f2169-f949-f5c5-9069-b6d0d7e110a7@pgmasters.net> <00B5FD97-A568-4270-B0CF-59BA7DEEBFEA@lenstra.fr> <20200929054427.GC7117@paquier.xyz> In-Reply-To: From: Simon Riggs Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 10:39:15 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table To: Ryan Lambert Cc: Masahiko Sawada , Surafel Temesgen , Michael Paquier , =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9mi_Lapeyre?= , Eli Marmor , David Steele , Vik Fearing , PostgreSQL Hackers , Georgios Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-CLOUD-SEC-AV-Info: enterprisedb,google_mail,monitor X-CLOUD-SEC-AV-Sent: true X-Gm-Spam: 0 X-Gm-Phishy: 0 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:19 PM Ryan Lambert wrote: >> Updated v11 with additional docs and some rewording of messages/tests >> to use "system versioning" correctly. >> >> No changes on the points previously raised. >> > Thank you! The v11 applies and installs. I tried a simple test, unfortunately it appears the versioning is not working. The initial value is not preserved through an update and a new row does not appear to be created. Agreed. I already noted this in my earlier review comments. I will send in a new version with additional tests so we can see more clearly that the tests fail on the present patch. I will post more on this next week. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/