Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sWiBC-00GsCY-Gj for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:01:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sWiBA-008REj-WA for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:01:40 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sWiBA-008REa-MN for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:01:40 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sWiB8-001FzX-0W for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:01:39 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a7a9a7af0d0so25465266b.3 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:01:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1721851296; x=1722456096; darn=postgresql.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JldEk2tbxohtRDEnjbSAUQ0wk/uIwBJrE+F5lgfYnCc=; b=YVvqQt3jecpgvfvtDS4NbxzG7Mz2Y8gpB3xiLWI7QpgXg6c7ziAMFixo0neTOXHKcB kdmTtru2oErHvq8ovvBB8vimZdz7o+wDCCa1QWOtTTIrrY5slzpFQ2OPKV1Nqn0gIKCm RnRg0XbDmxk6ktbp/wkCHoJr+09HgBw+m8ofUAzO13/xssqAyoY0rQJi5/rTulLa4u6W 3GpWmSQykbPlHxgQoTUbc/N65HAjGH49rKh8kGlHjxYVlGsJQCoczY2iLhYCHP9cG2N9 ZZgeUEGlOdQ/tzea+AY/BPIzRuBR05ZsKw6G7s1vlBgAIEsaABDemKJxclHxjHDFEAW3 I6bg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721851296; x=1722456096; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JldEk2tbxohtRDEnjbSAUQ0wk/uIwBJrE+F5lgfYnCc=; b=vxzpMLjvBkv20zTXnah0/An9MNU6ewUFnWqBjM+U+w3LV5xDeiauo/WbfNtqHXXZed 07SEhaTyTB8bXnt3eBqvXoeIh/+EjHiQhijE2NXB6pbOWb6h+6S089oFN0m2sKss1Oe1 YHetCW7yuE/9uojkarB7JAmIS4OhZaxtdzVBaV5CD8tDtfXG4/l+xKDG9ghAkN7/xXM6 4yAwlujfyVp4mHc0az1GN+aE4K0dui63oYQCwkyV5nPP8r/EUk69RBNZ2Ryc7sEow91n M53QKrT9n5APw4qWw0fJsLjog9E2qe/tj2E5sZpvDhHgQE1hl2jtJVcx7qHF6MBaf8RF Rn/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YywTApVzyj1sS1M2JhhpGMlYaYPAXm3/BkCIeFF/demYR1aUqMa O1/fgbXL6EV/tLK+ncsCan98FbPi6C/fBqpcYyXwpf6Z72dZV6kU8gnQi1HGcKgkZ9v10t/qfpU 9Z+GaHExtF8d6ow0PI0Z41m08n2SU5Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFL9VQ4fTPKeIfGxdFvlwikup2mCLyOiRTiL+Xh57WxcZBikIDU06FRoiKgf/QPSofn5nhYqEeMosJaYoK+R9U= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6d15:b0:a7a:bf0b:73c3 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a7ac517a9c4mr34206266b.30.1721851295631; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:01:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Michail Nikolaev Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:01:23 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative To: PostgreSQL Hackers , Andres Freund Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d5106d061e03be1f" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --000000000000d5106d061e03be1f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, everyone! Updates so far: * issue happens with both LOGGED and UNLOGGED relations * issue happens with DirtySnapshot * not happens with SnapshotSelf * not happens with SnapshotAny * not related to speculative inserted tuples - I have commented the code of its insertion - and the issue continues to occur. Best regards, Mikhail. --000000000000d5106d061e03be1f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello, everyone!

Updates so far:
<= div>* issue=C2=A0happens with both LOGGED and UNLOGGED relations
= * issue happens with DirtySnapshot
* not happens with SnapshotSel= f
* not happens with SnapshotAny
* not related to specu= lative inserted tuples - I have commented the code of its insertion - and t= he issue continues to occur.

Best regards,
Mikhail. --000000000000d5106d061e03be1f--