Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1veKXu-00By4A-2t for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 22:01:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1veKXt-008pnJ-2V for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 22:01:26 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1veKXt-008pnB-1W for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 22:01:26 +0000 Received: from mail-oi1-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::231]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1veKXs-005YR2-02 for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 22:01:25 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-x231.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-45090ef26c6so1728816b6e.2 for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 14:01:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1767996082; x=1768600882; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Yj1VEdVW6pFplbJLwnpxvnxnO234tzmx1QV+ep7gCr0=; b=FKlN3Zw5VsqRFdArNopM4T4shg42IDMlK5lNCPwZFJBzb8sH4PdcaJvLg5NBDW9sd6 MkrNI5nsTtE2hPzOOQcRYkVkkI1MKvcs1ZPyduimlNhJ4Cjas0QlORaXvEdo3fZ7fh/O /iGScsahmVmgniZzci3CBHAur+FYKhPO+qvWmJCZzG/DpmnG1swo6/JorqhTrWI+xH6W kb/WYAsuo/4Q/yWBItuhMobY+So39ezeb8OpHLes9EKxItIq3nwf0a3oeKAOgYBVgFla kg3Pixj9sOvuOdLj+VW2nc85CU3C8ViuccUfXJ6a2k/h9m4/Y32yLhtlrQZGBFIj2RX3 2C8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1767996082; x=1768600882; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Yj1VEdVW6pFplbJLwnpxvnxnO234tzmx1QV+ep7gCr0=; b=QLJuPrqWSoCjsCaShPTnzJQ2Jdffok1ao8DChpaGaLOhqtiXRzMbjO0iiNIWmshrym aQir12/hr6e/h83buEMwzkphdYTogaXBJt8rb6pdAV9StgerRZTC99O25B/EU/QXMTlL eAjt1LUOQWwt0IxLePp21bIJz6SN7o3g9rzBiCGaovkfBGNo6iqgJTF0yYOnuByjJzyo 5Z8Fi7EBfB48AoWtBIW2Aclc6ivAL7CTouLYX54xdwoxyS2yiA4Hf/DwGd/CNXMopN6v Cmav3OzcJg/RyRp5mXW4RV060FkJShDl8gHXdZO+TsyOy5mSqDB+G/ZqdpGon2xdPH6H XVsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzvmbFqEJ2BG1J6YfN5yFt2oskYV2X1lmCkx0B5ib4dQ/jSGpcj 4c8xsslwwgbGa/rvQ3GR0+U+D4NTEJxDcoLirgPSaZLbdI4slInXj1iRZl5jkhRN99ITNVHNP/D 71Pqtk3el53NABCan+WhUuUEd6TEDebI= X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX530s3aJIkLEVj0qXdM7YXDINXvUKr61xfWoFGZxUiGHzyka9dD2HDMin9vu34 ArVfX7luhf10JZOtJQwKFt4h49+eAJzhZH2BRcSLR1iw3QMLkwN4VvPrilgg4nlXB0btcLSVgWo 2iVB1eggNsbAE2/0K6UHCGtuhKCHIiRIYChubVkN9gFrOZ80hZJZa4HV6cSlqDN52rT1C85C4O6 vDSb47lgLgmnoWwx/chtvaMPi/ryCvFEbxKnZsAYPYe+UnG/efpNnrQo9+4BwlwOD+PykgkTpKp Pw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHQZXgZ2KS8OTzSRoZyNbT3/NS5xtrvXIFaIrL3geMahNIKCT7tH3V4b7NSnGaipC769hw7U80PPkp6H6E1Jos= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:150f:b0:45a:5894:4979 with SMTP id 5614622812f47-45a6bdbcf78mr6743260b6e.20.1767996081950; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 14:01:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: surya poondla Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 14:01:10 -0800 X-Gm-Features: AQt7F2pOmaaQ1pkg-V8gfWntexmsIFPHdaf4V5_awNlXUNNkn5kNZTg7pn7oOnI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH][DOC][MINOR] Fix incorrect lexeme limit in textsearch docs To: Dharin Shah Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006dd2bf0647fbaa80" List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk --0000000000006dd2bf0647fbaa80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dharin, I looked at your patch, it looks good. In the code, I couldn=E2=80=99t find any 2^64 bound on the lexeme count, so removing that makes sense. The added sentence about distinct lexeme count seems to overlap with the existing description of tsvector limits, so I=E2=80=99m not sure it adds mu= ch new information. -Surya Poondla > --0000000000006dd2bf0647fbaa80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Dharin,

I looked at your patch,= it looks good.

In the code, I couldn=E2=80=99t find any 2^64 bound = on the lexeme count, so removing that makes sense.
The added sentence ab= out distinct lexeme count seems to overlap with the existing description of= tsvector limits, so I=E2=80=99m not sure it adds much new information.

-Surya Poondla
--0000000000006dd2bf0647fbaa80--