MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAOYmi+nDZxJHaWj9_jRSyf8uMToCADAmOfJEggsKW-kY7aUwHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOYmi+mRhhzGUvrcdickepAnsdaGbqhNcboNe4-YvgtkSzGNbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGLyS-GK_rkENaVbFVTa4VJ+reJxWtt+q4gmgNUXhptfYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOYmi+k1q3feeMxfbaJA=+hx+XnOFQA0z2JU+0igA7fTUZTmoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKG+H1gwDh96jn5jB6Q3HyXrSC9x2y=uQJAthT8NLs6GN_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOYmi+n1xRNCDnwZzigXVk8V=+sr7ZzuGpJ0tAyozX-zQT19Gg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOYmi+mvk8Y7btYJhBzOGiNTY3cCpYZKjhA4-TP2Lkb=zOr4oQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGKV5aM1K3gc_kAMtUq-BkD5AugLUCDVa-RMnbfFypALwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+hUKGKt-5tB07T+ar+WaZCDuj-9CrnEUuy_O9giafAnaNzPwA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+hUKGKt-5tB07T+ar+WaZCDuj-9CrnEUuy_O9giafAnaNzPwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 11:19:21 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAOYmi+=3koJQD+u2ucSAWGsSa_5rKUcnmK5oMyGuSRkFssaZWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OAuth: fix performance bug with stuck multiplexer events
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
 Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOYmi%2B%3D3koJQD%2Bu2ucSAWGsSa_5rKUcnmK5oMyGuSRkFssaZWQ%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 7:43=E2=80=AFPM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com=
> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 1:45=E2=80=AFPM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.c=
om> wrote:
> I wonder if you would be interested in this attempt at centralised
> infrastructure for unit testing our C code over here.  I'm not
> suggesting it for your immediate problem, just noting the overlap:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKG%2BajSQ_8eu2AogTncOnZ=
5me2D-Cn66iN_-wZnRjLN%2Bicg%40mail.gmail.com

I am all for better testability at the function level, and it even
looks like 0002 solved a problem that stopped me from getting rid of
the Perl shim...

The "test without a running server" part also might have some overlap
with my fuzzing work. So I'll take a closer look later; thanks!

--Jacob