MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAOYmi+kt5UvPOXXXT9w_nHBNgcqiTQWS2j=D9qJaewvmO4iaAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOYmi+m2-2TH5AP7-8Knm_gcSiEaZVPGeUkfZeCLmYH395MYgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <B2A4AB83-C99D-4DF7-A310-50BF857739DA@yesql.se> <Z_Uzde7a1lCFaqfW@momjian.us>
 <CAOYmi+mrYnuwMEnpYWA4FWFtDCe4rMKavDrKQPpV43u=zmR8Xg@mail.gmail.com>
 <96b5b38b-2fac-409f-b922-f7fd653bf847@technowledgy.de>
 <Z_VLaJenqQ1vYsFc@momjian.us>
 <CAOYmi+mVzY5SXGeRNW+JMK-nJaX_2QL9Y6PnJOL6uhJk+YfHSA@mail.gmail.com>
 <Z_VP84n4-3M1Z9WU@momjian.us>
 <CAOYmi+noNW-39C2LXOqymdxSHuWSkOYy=RwqZo3t_ppGS6650A@mail.gmail.com>
 <Z_VTtvQgL5dIOzjk@momjian.us>
In-Reply-To: <Z_VTtvQgL5dIOzjk@momjian.us>
From: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 10:00:56 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAOYmi+m7W-2XajSiNAXo6BVnLyU64Shidx0wPb4F==x1YRAppQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de>,
 Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
	Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
	Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
 Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
	Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOYmi%2Bm7W-2XajSiNAXo6BVnLyU64Shidx0wPb4F%3D%3Dx1YRAppQ%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 9:49=E2=80=AFAM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wro=
te:
> On Tue, Apr  8, 2025 at 09:43:01AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > By adding the new .so to a different package. For example, RPM specs
> > would just let you say "hey, this .so I just built doesn't go into the
> > main client package, it goes into an add-on that depends on the client
> > package." It's the same way separate client and server packages get
> > generated from the same single build of Postgres.
>
> Do we have any idea how many packagers are interested in doing this?

I'm not sure how to answer this. The primary drivers from the dev side
are you and Tom, I think. Christoph seems to be on board with a split
as long as we don't make his life harder. Wolfgang appears to be a
packager who would not make use of a split (and in fact cannot).

--Jacob